That's exactly what people know about Geocentricity, the propaganda they learned in grade 4 and that newer is always better, ha what fools.

Also Alchemy is dumb as was most things that that Newton obsessed over, the man was crazy.

Congrats on thoroughly embarrassing yourself, lol.

so instead of actually researching you just come back to fuel your ego by perpetuating your ignorance. good choice.

you've fallen for propaganda when the reality is that alchemist knowledge was appropriated by the scientific community.

alchemy was a crucial step in our quest to understand our world. primitive yes, but certainly not the work of an idiot.

keep thinking that it was oh so simple to be an alchemist and they just mixed up fake medicines and spent 99% of their time trying to make gold.

This post was edited by Subwoofer on Sep 23 2016 03:08pm

Which was exactly my point, you halfwit. I don't know why you're so butthurt, but you should probably take a moment to collect your thoughts before you launch into a tirade of ill-informed rage on this forum

This post was edited by GetOnYourKnees on Sep 23 2016 05:31pm

dumb and primitive aren't synonyms, sorry you're too dumb to know it.

see how that word works now?

all pioneering works start from a primitive method and evolve. it's how science works, but idk why i expect you to know about scientific method when you don't even know the definitions of basic everyday words.

or do you think those alchemist should of just used their scanning electron microscopes and the internet back in 250 ad so they wouldn't be "dumb"?

i look forward to your next ignorant post chocked full of poor wording, poor insults, and willingly ignorant statements.

OP asked whether numerology should be considered with respect in this day and age. I said no, and compared it to alchemy, which also should not be considered as scientifically accurate, regardless of how useful it may or may not have been in the infancy of our species.

What exactly are you having trouble understanding here?

you said it was a "dumb concept".

that simply doesn't apply to the field. it required the same intelligence and curiosity that it takes for a modern scientist except in an age with far less technology to prop itself up on.

hell we are missing so much data about the field and much of what we do have was written in codes and riddles so idk why you pretend to be so educated on the subject you can dismiss it entirely like a superstition.

So are you reasonable professing that Alchemy is more rational than geocentricity? ok, lets hear some evidence that would make you think that.

without a flawed field you can't create a better one. sitting around waiting on scientific jesus and not proceeding by trial and error to the best of our abilities gets us nowhere.

heliocentricity is flawed, it relies on your assumptions and anti religious beliefs. Scrutiny is wholely rejected as "believe in religion" when the truth is understanding that either of those realities are simply man made constructions that deserve nothing.