d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature >
Poll > The Case For Electromagnetic Universe > + Other Heresy Against The Establishment
Prev123462Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 64,732
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
Jun 16 2016 07:42am
Quote (Voyaging @ Jun 16 2016 07:37am)
Well this has officially become the worst era in PaRD.


I finally understand the decline everybody has been talking about
Member
Posts: 24,507
Joined: Mar 2 2008
Gold: 8,231.41
Jun 16 2016 08:08am
Quote (Voyaging @ Jun 16 2016 07:37am)
Well this has officially become the worst era in PaRD.


Quote (Thor123422 @ Jun 16 2016 07:42am)
I finally understand the decline everybody has been talking about


and now it has been moved : d
Member
Posts: 64,732
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
Jun 16 2016 08:15am
Quote (Sakuraba @ Jun 16 2016 08:08am)
and now it has been moved : d


I pmed a junior mod right after I posted
Member
Posts: 39,763
Joined: Oct 24 2009
Gold: 11,305.00
Jun 16 2016 09:00am
MaliceMizer, card_sultan's brother from another mother :rofl:
Member
Posts: 64,732
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
Jun 16 2016 09:46am
Let's start at the first thing I see that is most related to the actual topic.

"the "magnet" isn't a magnet, it's an electrified dielectric object"

Please define "magnet", "electrified", "dielectric" and "dielectric object" in your own words.
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Jun 16 2016 09:59am
Quote (balrog66 @ Jun 16 2016 07:28am)
http://i.imgur.com/B9sNQzq.png

If you understand electromagnetics you should have an easy time answering these.


If you really understand Gravitational Waves, could you mathematic explain these?

Member
Posts: 64,732
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
Jun 16 2016 10:16am
Quote (card_sultan @ Jun 16 2016 09:59am)
If you really understand Gravitational Waves, could you mathematic explain these?

http://i64.tinypic.com/211uu6o.jpg


The difference here is that what balrog posted is still classic physics, whereas what you posted is something only an expert physicist in that field would understand.

I figured I would explain it to you since you're still struggling with F = ma
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Jun 16 2016 12:30pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Jun 16 2016 11:16am)
The difference here is that what balrog posted is still classic physics, whereas what you posted is something only an expert physicist in that field would understand.

I figured I would explain it to you since you're still struggling with F = ma


Newtonian Second Law of Physics, also says that at Object at rests stay at rest - Therefore He proved Flat Earth mathematically. :P

Since you can't explain the math of Gravitational wave Theory - I'll have to accept the theory you actually studied physics is just a lie.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Jun 16 2016 12:37pm
Member
Posts: 13,231
Joined: Feb 1 2010
Gold: 4.77
Jun 16 2016 03:21pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ 16 Jun 2016 10:46)
Let's start at the first thing I see that is most related to the actual topic.

"the "magnet" isn't a magnet, it's an electrified dielectric object"

Please define "magnet", "electrified", "dielectric" and "dielectric object" in your own words.


The word magnet comes from magic, or perhaps the other way around.
The relationship of magneto-dielectricity is mandatory for understand magnetism and the nature of how electrification operates in the creation of a magnet.


Magnetism: spacial, circulatory, radiative, polarized, both centrifugal & centripetal

dielectric: inertial, centripetal, counterspacial, radial; magnetic fieldal radiation, and dielectric generation,
or inertia.





Electrified: full of electric fluid charge by supporting medium. Energy does not exist physically, but is the "do work", which is equal to "force over time".
The word "energy" is a convenient fiction, like "time"


Dielectric object: The permanent magnet is an electrically charged dielectric object, but that dielectricity is counterspatial, inertial, radial, and
centripetal. All such permanent magnets have magnetism as secondary attributes to their electrification.
These are moved about in a strict accordance to cause and effect.











Member
Posts: 13,231
Joined: Feb 1 2010
Gold: 4.77
Jun 16 2016 03:29pm
Quote (balrog66 @ 16 Jun 2016 07:28)
http://i.imgur.com/B9sNQzq.png

If you understand electromagnetics you should have an easy time answering these.


This shit ain't easy cuz I R dum dum flat brain.





Oh wait no, the garbage is obsolete. Lorentz is garbage, he measured the torus the same all the way across. Help me build a new one smrty pantz cuz centrifugal and centripetal.



or do you need my credentials too


This post was edited by MaliceMizer on Jun 16 2016 03:30pm
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
Prev123462Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll