Quote (FullArcFG @ May 1 2015 06:50pm)
Huh?
I had Photovoltic panels installed for FREE zero out of pocket no lease. Just agreed to buy power at .05 below my current providers cost "locked" for all the power the panels produce. how is this even remotely expensive? But I agree Nuclear is likely the best bet since solar is so shaky with clouds and Zero output at night. I spoke to a Physicist from Brookhaven labs and he said we need to better develop Fast neutron reactor design that has a tiny fraction of the risk of current models. He indicated the problem was the US navy chose the BWR design over the Fast neutron design due to the Liquid sodium used would react violently if exposed to water. Navy ships are in water....
But as far as hydrogen goes, it is a byproduct of Manufacturing Oxygen so I don't know if it would be true to rule it out due to Co2 produced in manufacturing. Realistically if Nuclear or Solar can be used to create the Hydrogen/oxygen then big Win no?
The solar is probably subsidized by taxes and america is currently under mountains of debt which is a bad long term cost. Solar panels also create co2 during construction. But its good to hear its becoming an option.
The cheapest way to make hydrogen currently is with the water gas shift reaction from coal-derived syngas. Hydrogen from electrolysis powered by renewable energy would be nice infrastructure but the cost per unit of h2 is very high and not very thermodynamically efficient.
Thats interesting about nuclear power though. I should look into it.