Quote (PixileDust @ Oct 31 2014 09:45pm)
Where did I suggest that it was teleological?
here
Quote (PixileDust @ Oct 31 2014 12:16am)
We are the pinnacle of the phenomenon known as "life."
if there is a pinnacle then there is something that has best achieved something that is to be achieved.
now here's an other problem.
Quote (PixileDust @ Oct 31 2014 12:16am)
I think it is too risky to stay on one planet; we are too valuable from a scientific perspective.
you're assuming that a scientific perspective knows value outside of the value that humans might have for the insights given by a "scientific perspective".
Quote (PixileDust @ Oct 31 2014 12:16am)
Should we not attempt to further science and technology to help proliferate ourselves throughout the universe?
that's assuming that technology would lead to such an outcome, or that science or technology has any use outside of what use humans have of them. or that science/technology is always beneficial. do they exist for themselves or for those who created them?
Quote (PixileDust @ Oct 31 2014 08:19pm)
Evolution is simply the survival of the fittest. We are definitely at the peak of that definition.
a plethora of other creatures exist as well.
This post was edited by Gastly on Oct 31 2014 01:01pm