OP is
A. either being extremely sarcastic/satirical
or..
B. OP is 'trolling' like a 12 year old
or..
C. OP has the IQ of a grape and is likely a SJW feminist
--- --- --- --- --- ---
Let me elaborate.
If we go with theory A, OP is being satirical in which case he understands the importance of merit and science, and should probably be logical enough to see this thread is a waste of time (bait taken)
If we go with theory B, OP will likely continue to troll until his maturity exceeds that of a 12 year old. The 'troll' was hardly clever or funny in this event.
If we go with theory C, please let me know what achievements feminist scientists have contributed to humanity that is if your rainbow colored drool cup isn't too full of course.
Based on the quotes in this thread and the following quote I would think it's a combo of B + C.
Quote (killg0re @ May 9 2014 02:35am)
Yes, if we base everything off merit we leave everyone who hasn't accomplished anything in the dark.
Are you seriously implying that rewarding people that have achieved and contributed nothing should be valued just for existing? With that type of logic/standard none of the luxuries you enjoy today would have came to fruition.
In other words we'd still be hedonistic unintelligent chimps that only care about humping all da... Wait a second....
This post was edited by Blankey on May 21 2014 06:59pm