d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > Global Warming Facts And Misconceptions
Prev1234Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 8,010
Joined: Jan 21 2009
Gold: 17.00
Jan 30 2014 03:43pm
Quote (King Atrhur @ Jan 30 2014 04:33pm)


Also being locked does not give you the right to judge him.
You have no idea why he is locked, since theres no scammer tag we can all agree he did not scam so who cares really why it happened.


Either way he didn't something grimy. whether he took his dads credit card or some how scammed gold one way or another.
Member
Posts: 15,114
Joined: Nov 18 2005
Gold: 89,176.00
Jan 30 2014 05:36pm
Quote (Historic @ Jan 30 2014 03:25pm)
What about the claims that co2 doesn't raise temps and that there is evidence of the earth having higher temperature in the past then there is now? it's kinda like who do you believe there is a shit ton of people saying its caused by humans and its not. I mean maybe there is an agenda to make global warming out to be a lie but if that's so why? what would someone gain from trying to say global warming is fake? I dont see why someone would spend time an energy to say its fake when they will get nothing to gain from that.


There's lots of money in the status quo.
Politicians get their cut from big businesses who have a vested interest in downplaying climate change.
Member
Posts: 28,331
Joined: Jun 9 2007
Gold: 11,700.00
Jan 30 2014 06:53pm
Quote (Historic @ 30 Jan 2014 21:42)
It's really hard as basically both scientist arguing against teh same thing with "peer reviewed" date. like last night it was 10 degrees here in NY and we have had like at least 5 snows 2 of which were near unable to drive in. I remember when i was alot younger we NEVER got snow for a good few years in a row.I know this is just minimal data.
that's just a single point of data, actually anecdotal 'evidence' at the very best - many places in australia had in 2013 the highest temperature ever recorded, do you accept as conclusive evidence?
I just don't understand how ppl like azrad could come in and even utter "climate change denier"
You have equal as many ppl arguing against climate change as you do for it. And i'm pretty sure a non scientific kid from jsp doesn't have teh right to judge someone for being a skeptic its ridiculous.  roughly 1.53°F (0.85ºC) from 1880 to 2012,  since industrial revolution they claim we dump 90 million tons of pollution a year. I'm not saying on for either or I'm just on the fence.


which people are you counting?
since in the following sentence you question "Azrad"s capacity to provide a judgement because you suspect he has no scientific credentials
you would have to discount all non scientific people but rather focus on (from http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus):

97% of climate scientists agree

while i do not know what scientific credentials "Azrad" has, but i am pretty sure he has more science relevant credentials than you do and he has also shown that he has a pretty good knowledge (ie substantially more than the average joe you included in your 'equal as many') as evidenced by many posts in this forum and homework help line - and why i am curious as well why he has been locked (can't even pm him), i doubt very much that he has done anything bad (there are many reasons someone can get locked, just doing something stupid or being caught up in the scam of someone else are two of the many options)

and to add a comment on those 3% who do not agree:
see "taekvideo"s post and guess how many of those 3% are employed by big oil, big coal, etc or are even young earth creationists (or both)

This post was edited by brmv on Jan 30 2014 07:22pm
Member
Posts: 8,010
Joined: Jan 21 2009
Gold: 17.00
Jan 30 2014 08:51pm
Let me be more specific here the controversy here is whether humans are causing the global warming. Ofc I accept the anecdotal evidence why the fucking fuck do you think I made the goddamn thread asking others what they think goddamnit.. and azrad i don't him from a hole in the wall. All I know is that he constantly mocks and harasses me for past threads I have made. I am not a scientist and I don't give a fuck about that. I'm a hands on mechanical guy.

I should of been more clear on the statement you highlighted of mine with the biggest font. It **seems** to me that there are equal amount of ppl arguing for and against it. climate scientist and because they are "climate scientist" that makes them right over other scientists? I don't understand why you people are get snark with me for responding to azrad when he clearly mocks me I come in here I didn't say OMG climate science is a lie I don't fucking know that. And I also suspect that most people here don't have scientific credentials if you do proof your college education then. it's just cocky people "my link is better then your link we hate historic" bullshit If you dont like my thread or the name historic dont click on it to mock me.

This post was edited by Historic on Jan 30 2014 08:58pm
Member
Posts: 28,331
Joined: Jun 9 2007
Gold: 11,700.00
Jan 30 2014 09:35pm
Quote (Historic @ 31 Jan 2014 02:51)
Let me be more specific here the controversy here is whether humans are causing the global warming. Ofc I accept the anecdotal evidence why the fucking fuck do you think I made the goddamn thread asking others what they think goddamnit.. and azrad i don't him from a hole in the wall. All I know is that he constantly mocks and harasses me for past threads I have made. I am not a scientist and I don't give a fuck about that. I'm a hands on mechanical guy.
I should of been more clear on the statement you highlighted of mine with the biggest font. It **seems** to me that there are equal amount of ppl arguing for and against it. climate scientist and because they are "climate scientist" that makes them right over other scientists? I don't understand why you people are get snark with me for responding to azrad when he clearly mocks me I come in here I didn't say OMG climate science is a lie I don't fucking know that. And I also suspect that most people here don't have scientific credentials if you do proof your college education then. it's just cocky people "my link is better then your link we hate historic" bullshit If you dont like my thread or the name historic dont click on it to mock me.


at the first point you made: the rate of average temperature change in the last century strongly correlates with man made agent contributing
at you following statement: if you would use a more civilised language people might take you more seriously
and re 'climate scientists': those people are better trained to analyse/judge weather effects than others - would you go to an er to get your car serviced?
and re mocking: if you repeat the same type of mistakes without considering comments people made to your posts (and then check from other sources) plus indicate where your position is after that it is very tempting to assume that you are not learning anything and troll/mock you - there is only a certain amount of silliness one can take
you might be right in assuming that plenty people here do not have a degree to prove their scientific credential but quite a few have had relevant subjects in (senior) highschool [physics, chemistry etc were compulsory for me] or several college courses - and i can live with you not believing whatever credential i have, but i divulge personal information only to friends
also making comments in silly threads is sometimes essential to prevent those with less knowledge to believe the bullshit posted
Member
Posts: 8,010
Joined: Jan 21 2009
Gold: 17.00
Jan 30 2014 09:50pm
Quote (brmv @ Jan 30 2014 10:35pm)
at the first point you made: the rate of average temperature change in the last century strongly correlates with man made agent contributing
at you following statement: if you would use a more civilised language people might take you more seriously
and re 'climate scientists': those people are better trained to analyse/judge weather effects than others - would you go to an er to get your car serviced?
and re mocking: if you repeat the same type of mistakes without considering comments people made to your posts (and then check from other sources) plus indicate where your position is after that it is very tempting to assume that you are not learning anything and troll/mock you - there is only a certain amount of silliness one can take
you might be right in assuming that plenty people here do not have a degree to prove their scientific credential but quite a few have had relevant subjects in (senior) highschool [physics, chemistry etc were compulsory for me] or several college courses - and i can live with you not believing whatever credential i have, but i divulge personal information only to friends
also making comments in silly threads is sometimes essential to prevent those with less knowledge to believe the bullshit posted



I think it was pretty clear where my position is here. And I'm pretty sure I didn't deserved to be mocked right off the bat. If you have the credentials yeah I respect that. just because you say you have them doesn't mean you do.
After all of this i still dont understand how Co2 raises temperatures and why there is evidence of the climate being warmer in the past. If you wanna take something i'ms aying a certain way skip the point of the thread go straight to judging me whats the point? Your asking me why someone would get angry at a smart ass prick.


This post was edited by Historic on Jan 30 2014 09:54pm
Member
Posts: 10,812
Joined: Oct 15 2009
Gold: Locked
Warn: 20%
Jan 30 2014 09:57pm
Quote (Historic @ Jan 30 2014 02:25pm)
What about the claims that co2 doesn't raise temps
CO2 has a large cross-section for scattering infrared photons.
CO2 has a small cross-section for scattering photons in the visible range.
This alone is enough to establish that increasing the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere will increase temperatures.


Quote (brmv @ Jan 30 2014 05:53pm)
while i do not know what scientific credentials "Azrad" has, but i am pretty sure he has more science relevant credentials than you do and he has also shown that he has a pretty good knowledge (ie substantially more than the average joe you included in your 'equal as many') as evidenced by many posts in this forum and homework help line - and why i am curious as well why he has been locked (can't even pm him), i doubt very much that he has done anything bad (there are many reasons someone can get locked, just doing something stupid or being caught up in the scam of someone else are two of the many options)
I have a degree in mathematics, but I did take quite a few physics courses along the way (that was my original major), so I suppose I don't have any "credentials". I was locked for arbitraging between Diablo III gold and fg, which is not against any of the rules on this site (but as we all know, this site has no rules).


Quote (Historic @ Jan 30 2014 07:51pm)
All I know is that he constantly mocks and harasses me for past threads I have made.
You made those threads, not me. I don't think it is unreasonable when trying to evaluate what someone is claiming in the present, to consider what they have claimed in the past. Or as I like to say "crazy does not exist in a vacuum". Meaning if you think someone is saying something crazy now, if you go and look into the past you will very likely find additional craziness. This is why I do the YouTube channel review posts.
Member
Posts: 8,010
Joined: Jan 21 2009
Gold: 17.00
Jan 30 2014 10:00pm
Quote (Azrad @ Jan 30 2014 10:57pm)
CO2 has a large cross-section for scattering infrared photons.
CO2 has a small cross-section for scattering photons in the visible range.
This alone is enough to establish that increasing the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere will increase temperatures.


I have a degree in mathematics, but I did take quite a few physics courses along the way (that was my original major), so I suppose I don't have any "credentials". I was locked for arbitraging between Diablo III gold and fg, which is not against any of the rules on this site (but as we all know, this site has no rules).


You made those threads, not me. I don't think it is unreasonable when trying to evaluate what someone is claiming in the present, to consider what they have claimed in the past. Or as I like to say "crazy does not exist in a vacuum". Meaning if you think someone is saying something crazy now, if you go and look into the past you will very likely find additional craziness. This is why I do the YouTube channel review posts.


I don't understand were you mocking me for my past threads or no? Just because someone questions something doesn't mean anything maybe I just wanted to know the specifics.
Assuming you were mocking me about population control because I made a thread about Georgia grindstones I think there is nothing wrong any way shape of form questioning a 20 ft tall statue that says keep humanity near 5000000

This post was edited by Historic on Jan 30 2014 10:01pm
Member
Posts: 8,010
Joined: Jan 21 2009
Gold: 17.00
Jan 30 2014 10:07pm
The only real thing and I'm gonna be honest about that i overreacted on was the dollar collapsing. as far as GMO's it's kinda hard to hear that all ovther countrys but US bans them and have Obama sign Monsanto protection act.

I don't understand you find absolutely nothing inconsistent and strange about ANY of the threads Ive have made?

This post was edited by Historic on Jan 30 2014 10:08pm
Member
Posts: 28,331
Joined: Jun 9 2007
Gold: 11,700.00
Jan 30 2014 10:13pm
Quote (Azrad @ 31 Jan 2014 03:57)
...
I have a degree in mathematics, i thought so but I did take quite a few physics courses along the way and i thought so as well, was not sure if you have a degree or not in physics (that was my original major), so I suppose I don't have any "credentials". I was locked for arbitraging between Diablo III gold and fg, which is not against any of the rules on this site (but as we all know, this site has no rules).
hope they remove the "locked" status soon or at least the pm blockage if that can be independently done
and good to have confirmed my suspicion that you were not involved in something vile

You made those threads, not me. I don't think it is unreasonable when trying to evaluate what someone is claiming in the present, to consider what they have claimed in the past. Or as I like to say "crazy does not exist in a vacuum". Meaning if you think someone is saying something crazy now, if you go and look into the past you will very likely find additional craziness. This is why I do the YouTube channel review posts.


Quote (Historic @ 31 Jan 2014 04:00)
I don't understand were you mocking me for my past threads or no? Just because someone questions something doesn't mean anything maybe I just wanted to know the specifics.
Assuming you were mocking me about population control because I made a thread about Georgia grindstones I think there is nothing wrong any way shape of form questioning a 20 ft tall statue that says keep humanity near 5000000


do you now have a better understanding re climate change/global warming from post#17?
if yes, remember it is always nice to get some positive feedback from someone you helped
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
Prev1234Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll