Here's the truth: cancer is a terrible and real-hard to cure disease. People invest a lot of cash to ease patient suffering and try to find a cure.

Because there are billions of dollars at it, that attacks a lot of charlatans. The OP is, but a short list of them I'm afraid. The FDA protects our interests. The OP is an indication they're doing their job.

they will cure cancer right after the give out the antidote for aids that they have had for decades.

Aids' HIV virus mutates rapidly. So you can't develop an effective "antidote" without having it become rapidly ineffective. That's simple biology. Sad might I add.


/edit: corrected a typo.



This post was edited by Dmon_Hunter on Dec 26 2012 08:59pm

fda does not protect our interests thats a load of shit. if they did there would be a lot of shit banned from food.

they do ban things that will kill you if ingested. but if it takes a few extra years to take effect then its totally fine by them.

This post was edited by lone500 on Dec 26 2012 09:21pm

Pee is sterile. This method of treatment is actually kind of old too.

if your neighbor has a cow and you want to buy fresh milk & it hasn't been pasteurized the feds will be at his door.
but yet u can go down to the corner market and stock up on alcohol & cigarettes
I can't imagine anyone would drink a bunch of milk & cause them to crash their car killing an innocent family


they only thing the FDA is protecting people from is health & the truth.

try banning tobacco, let alone alcohol

wont happen

my point

I understand your complaints. The FDA is certainly not the perfect solution.
I have no problem with people wanting to drink raw milk. Just make them put a BIG warning label on it, something along the lines of:
"Consuming unpasteurized milk is dangerous, and is still the leading cause of food borne illness. By drinking this you are basically thumbing your nose at the germ theory of disease. If you drink this you are stupid".

This post was edited by Azrad on Dec 31 2012 11:22pm