I'm sure there was some reconstruction of a degraded genome involved.

I've yet to full read the article, but 30,000 years is a long time and the damage must have been apparent.

I'm missing the Mistical Science here.........

Mr. Gubin said the study has demonstrated that tissue can survive ice conservation for tens of thousands of years.

Frozen Plant seeds thawed and allowed to grow. Heck my wife does this all the time. How does this have anything to do with a creationist argument?

Haters gonna hate

This post was edited by FullArcFG on Feb 26 2012 02:55pm

God has a plan for everything and that encompasses its extinction.

When we fiddle with the natural flow of these things it can be viewed as 'bastardous'.

Mind you that this study is a precursor to repopulative studies that will undoubtedly follow.

the statistical nature of quantum mechanics suggests otherwise

This post was edited by novocane on Feb 26 2012 09:15pm

Ah ha, but now you're attempting to bring in a tangent to a subject that it doesn't fit in.

That's like trying to blend oil and water.

Don't let me misrepresent myself; I am a man of science. On that note, don't let yourself be misrepresented with paradoxical, childish arguments.

wtf are you talking about

theres nothing paradoxical or childish about that statement

the nature of quantum mechanics suggests that things "dont happen for a reason" or that there isnt any kind of plan

you can try and throw all the random words out there you want, but the reality is that you made a statement that science doesn't agree with. thats really all there is to it

This post was edited by novocane on Feb 26 2012 09:53pm

Suggests and you're attempting to disprove something that, by definition, is unprovable with science.

The epitome of a paradoxical argument.

where in any of my post do you see the word disprove or any derivative of it?

all I said was quantum mechanics suggests what you said isn't true

That statement is completely true, accurate, and theres nothing paradoxical about it.

all i ever said was you were probably wrong


if i said the world probably isn't going to end tomorrow, you wouldnt start telling me that that was a paradoxial statement

That seemed like a pretty direct method of calling my post false.

Besides, I never called your statement paradoxical. I called the application of it to the constructs of a higher power paradoxical and childish.