Quote (frankthetank00 @ Mar 18 2011 09:34pm)
my point is science has been based in materialism. you need models and evidence to make up theories. Many people astral project but how would they prove it to you? Many people have had dreams of the future
The vast majority of these predictions have all been wrong. The ones that ended up having some truth contained in them only had some truth because the predictions were extremely vague and could have been applied to ANY generic event (e.g. Nostradamus).
Quote
and had out of body experiences but our understandings aren't advanced enough to measure and understand the nature of our consiousness. science is great but lacking in the department of consciousness.
Consciousness is what it is. It's the ability of people to think, and thinking is purely a series of electrical and chemical processes that go on inside the brain. Astral projections and seeing the future is unverifiable, untestable, completely without evidence, and purely faith-based.
Quote
"Being unsatisfied with the truth of the matter doesn't mean it's any less true." this applies equally for you. just because science doesn't understand certain things yet, you want to soothe your ego by saying it is probably is not real when we both dont know.
Just because there are two possibilities (they are real or they are unreal) does not mean these two options are equally likely. The fact of the matter is that it's far more likely that they don't exist than they do. For example, neither of us can prove whether or not there is a tea cup currently in orbit around the planet Mars, and yet I feel 100% confident in saying that there isn't.
Quote
if you use science open mindedly to try to reveal the mysteries of the universe then it's a great tool, but if people blindly follow and believe only what the scientific community currently believes then it kind of just makes it like a dogmatic religion
This is where you're wrong. Open-mindedness doesn't mean blindly believing in everything that is unproven. It means that you don't blindly cling to something when presented with information that disproves your previously held beliefs. The fact that you're believing in something that has no evidence means that you're believing in it on faith. THAT is the dogmatic religion. By contrast, I do not have faith in the existence of astral projection. That is not the same thing as having faith that astral projection does not exist.