One minor problem I have with the current conclusion is that the dating used is was only by the stratigraphy. To have a reliable dating, I'd say they would have to include more than one way. IE C-14 dating to confirm.
Also, if OP had any kind of brain, he'd have read further than just the line that insinuates humans could have originated from Israel.
Quote
Sir Paul Mellars, a prehistory expert at Cambridge University, said the study is reputable, and the find is "important" because remains from that critical time period are scarce, but it is premature to say the remains are human.
"Based on the evidence they've cited, it's a very tenuous and frankly rather remote possibility," Mellars said. He said the remains are more likely related to modern man's ancient relatives, the Neanderthals.
According to today's accepted scientific theories, modern humans and Neanderthals stemmed from a common ancestor who lived in Africa about 700,000 years ago. One group of descendants migrated to Europe and developed into Neanderthals, later becoming extinct. Another group stayed in Africa and evolved into Homo sapiens — modern humans.
Teeth are often unreliable indicators of origin, and analyses of skull remains would more definitively identify the species found in the Israeli cave, Mellars said.
The conclusion we can draw is that a very old tooth was found, but it is not yet sure how old it is or what's it from.