d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature >
Poll > Lets See Who Slept In Science Class. > Buoyancy Test For U All.
Prev12
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 6,591
Joined: Aug 3 2008
Gold: 663.00
Oct 30 2009 10:40am
Quote (WidowMaKer_MK @ 30 Oct 2009 11:56)
actually it depends on the density of the ice cube , not the volume .


oh word, i did not even realize what i had posted.
Member
Posts: 9,899
Joined: May 7 2006
Gold: 550.00
Oct 30 2009 06:52pm
Quote (WidowMaKer_MK @ Oct 30 2009 10:56am)
actually it depends on the density of the ice cube , not the volume .


Pretty sure density of ice is always .91 g/cm3. You're right that its about density though. If it was any other frozen solid besides ice the answer would be different.

Answer is the water level stays the same. It displaces its mass in the equivalent volume of water when its floating, and once it melts, the mass it was displacing is its own volume.
Member
Posts: 12,199
Joined: Jun 3 2006
Gold: 10,188.69
Nov 1 2009 03:06am
since the rock in the boat would put the boat into the water a bit deeper, the volume should stay the same after the rock was thrown out:
the boat will be lighter therefore rise out of the water further. but the rock will still does his part, which should be exactly the same?
Member
Posts: 10,459
Joined: Apr 21 2007
Gold: 11,010.00
Nov 1 2009 05:33pm
it depends on how heavy is the rock.

think of it, for the rock with same volume (size),
a heavier rock would cause the boat to sink more,
a lighter rock would cause the boat to sink less.

however, since the volume of the rock is constant,
the rise in water level would remains constant.

therefore, for a super heavy rock, the water level would fall after it is thrown into the water.
use your brain before you vote :chicken:

Quote (ass666 @ Oct 30 2009 04:16pm)
stays the same because I remember a story about Archimedes and him proving that a crown was gold or not because the amount of water displaced was in relation to mass. So well it just makes sense to me, it would stay the same.


that is only true when the whole item is in water

This post was edited by hk_nobody on Nov 1 2009 05:42pm
Member
Posts: 1,622
Joined: Aug 7 2009
Gold: 11.11
Nov 1 2009 06:06pm
Quote (ass666 @ Oct 30 2009 12:16pm)
stays the same because I remember a story about Archimedes and him proving that a crown was gold or not because the amount of water displaced was in relation to mass. So well it just makes sense to me, it would stay the same.


In relation to VOLUME, not mass. Two objects with different masses but equal volume will displace the same amount of water when submerged. If the density of an object is lower than the density of water, it will displace the amount of water equal to its weight.
Archimedes found that the crown displaced more water than a piece of gold of the SAME mass, meaning that the crown was less dense than gold, because with equal mass it had more volume.
Member
Posts: 9,181
Joined: Aug 28 2009
Gold: 0.53
Nov 1 2009 09:02pm
This thread was answered fairly quick. Not difficult enough of a question.
Member
Posts: 9,648
Joined: Sep 24 2008
Gold: 4,595.00
Nov 6 2009 10:55am
Quote (Katey @ Nov 1 2009 08:02pm)
This thread was answered fairly quick. Not difficult enough of a question.


Well over half the people have gotten it wrong.
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
Prev12
Add Reply New Topic New Poll