Quote (Kamikizzle @ Wed, 10 Dec 2008, 17:00)
what do you mean what kind of meaning is attached?
I was making a kind of semantic point that the word 'infinite' falls under a variety of descriptions, in both mathematics and in more concrete terms. Infinite in number, infinite in size, infinite in series ... all of these will have different applicantions inside and outside equations. More particulary the "real world" sense of 'infinite' with respect to black holes is divided: they are infinitely dense, so this means their density is unimaginably great; we can't observe or really imagine this density, so it's unfathomable [a 2nd sense]; the density of two different black holes should be distinct, so the density of a given black hole is uniquely great [a 3rd sense], etc. It's no objection to what you're saying, but it's a way of saying that 'infinite' has a variety of meanings, and it's not the same infinity each time, even if it's infinite density being considered.
"In order to be able to set a limit to thought, we should have to find both sides of the limit thinkable (i.e. we should have to be able to think what cannot be thought)" - Ludwig Wittgenstein
It's interesting stuff, because we're talking about an event or singularity in which we've gone beyond a certain threshold in which light begins to bend back into the dying star, so that now light can't escape because it's caught within the Schwarzschild Radius and the escape velocity is so fast, and then we've got density and mass but no volume, so we're talking about a really strange beast. What really interests me is gravity in all of this. Since we've got so much mass, we're going to have a lot of gravity. The idea I discussed earlier in the topic brings up the notion that over time, we've lost gravity
via black holes, and so gravity has become a weaker force; or, we could say that gravity has leaked out into another universe or pocket-universe. the effect must be cumulative if the idea is right, because black holes don't really suck up all of their surroundings. That's because of the field or Schwarzschild Radius around them. I could be off-base with that sexy idea, but it's probably no more far-fetched than the idea that Einstein-Rosen bridges give us worm holes
This post was edited by RewtheBrave on Dec 11 2008 01:52am