i feel as though we are not considering humans do not have to struggle for survival anymore. We can endure just about any environment we choose to live in, which rules out natural selection and survival of the fittest. And random mutations aren't nursed into becoming abundant. what do you think?

Some are struggling. Enough of us aren't which will dilute any of the favorable traits the struggling pass on. As of now, technology has replaced our need to evolve physically.

are you not considering other part of the world where there is famine, war, disease yet undeveloped?

for developed countries, we are evolving in terms of intelligence, in terms of physical appearance, also evolving the gene to "stay slim while eating alot of high calories junk"

You make a good point but yea we are still evolving.. evolution takes time ofc

i dont think we are evolving anymore we have everything needed for survival
thumb to bonk our prey with a club
canine teeth to tear flesh
molars to eat plant
incisors to gnaw down trees
sweat when we are hot
we grow arm, leg, chest hair to warm up our body
we can stand up right
basically we dominate in everything

Smart people have 2-3 kids, while any Chinese has 10+

Evolution has gone to hell!

smart people have no kids. never.

Even worse then The God damn Chinese still have 10+

Yes. Example given: overall we humans are becoming better looking. If you look at 100 years ago or so and now we are on average better looking. (This is true).

you know China only allow 1 children per couple right? there is no free education/social benefits after the first child. thus most poor chinese family only have 1 kid.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-child_policy

This post was edited by hk_nobody on Jan 16 2010 08:02pm