d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > Clean Fusion
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 20,461
Joined: Jun 16 2008
Gold: 722.53
Warn: 10%
Sep 9 2009 12:01am
Completely clean + efficient fusion!

In recently completed test experiments, the researchers were able to achieve temperatures that reached up to two billion degrees in some shots of the plasma focus device, well surpassing previous records of 520 million degrees achieved by the commonly used tokamak device. The much larger and more expensive tokamak has been cornerstone of the US fusion program for 25 years.

In addition, the “density-confinement time product,” which is the plasma density multiplied by the duration of the plasma event, exceeded that produced in a Tokamak by a factor of eight. The larger the density and confinement time, the more fusion fuel is burned, and the greater the total energy output. The deuterium fuel used in the recent test and the hydrogen-boron fuel for planned tests, which is expected to produce a superior outcome, are both commonly available.

These results are significant because temperatures above 1 billion degrees are needed to burn hydrogen-boron fuel. When hydrogen and boron fuse in a plasma focus they release energy in the form of a beam of charged particles—nuclei of helium atoms. This beam can be converted directly to electricity through a kind of high-tech transformer. This would be much cheaper than producing steam to drive turbines as occurs in fossil fuel and nuclear-electric generator plants.

Another advantage of the hydrogen boron reaction is that it produces no high-energy neutrons (in fact produces almost no neutrons at all), and so does not create radioactive products in the reactor structure or elsewhere. In contrast, deuterium-tritium, the fuel planned to be used in the tokamak and other fusion reactor concepts, releases its energy in the form of high energy neutrons, creating radioactivity in the reactors and necessitating the same steam cycle that is in use today.

Source: http://focusfusion.org/index.php/site/article/49/

This post was edited by AEtheric on Sep 9 2009 12:01am
Member
Posts: 33,701
Joined: Jul 17 2006
Gold: 1,990.00
Sep 9 2009 12:07am
is there any mention of when these reactors will go commercial?
Member
Posts: 9,694
Joined: Mar 14 2006
Gold: 148.95
Sep 9 2009 10:05am
Two billion is very very hot lol.
Member
Posts: 33,701
Joined: Jul 17 2006
Gold: 1,990.00
Sep 9 2009 11:33am
Quote (jer-is-da-best @ Wed, Sep 9 2009, 09:05am)
Two billion is very very hot lol.


your powers of observation are alarming
Member
Posts: 15,311
Joined: Mar 22 2008
Gold: 1,822.12
Trader: Trusted
Sep 9 2009 04:07pm
This is incredibly interesting. I wonder what else they could use this technique for.
Member
Posts: 20,461
Joined: Jun 16 2008
Gold: 722.53
Warn: 10%
Sep 9 2009 06:44pm
Quote (SirRonLionHeart @ Wed, Sep 9 2009, 10:07pm)
This is incredibly interesting. I wonder what else they could use this technique for.


Propulsion in space.
Member
Posts: 14,099
Joined: Jul 13 2006
Gold: 83.30
Sep 10 2009 06:53am
Quote (Kamikizzle @ Wed, Sep 9 2009, 06:07am)
is there any mention of when these reactors will go commercial?


Currently most fusion reactors are still in need of more power than they can produce. ITER (International Tokamak Experimental Reactor) in France is the newest project on nuclear fusion and they expect it to make a net power of ~500MW. Beware, this reactor is still experimental, so the current expectations for commercial nuclear fusion range from 20-40 years (that is, of course if all experimenting goes ok).
Member
Posts: 9,692
Joined: Apr 10 2006
Gold: 19,597.59
Sep 11 2009 06:17pm
cold fusion happens at room temperatures, but produces very little. just read a chapter dedicated to explaining it to the leyperson.
Member
Posts: 4,985
Joined: Jul 7 2006
Gold: 5,001.00
Sep 12 2009 12:13pm
cold fusion vs hot fusion?
whats the difference besides temperature.
Member
Posts: 14,099
Joined: Jul 13 2006
Gold: 83.30
Sep 12 2009 05:09pm
Quote (kinxor @ Sat, Sep 12 2009, 06:13pm)
cold fusion vs hot fusion?
whats the difference besides temperature.


Cold fusion is theory and regarded as a myth by most scientists. The hotter fusion has been tested and confirmed. Cold fusion has not been confirmed yet to be a viable source of energy.
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll