d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > Survival Of The Sickest
123Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 29,427
Joined: Sep 17 2007
Gold: 742.59
Dec 12 2008 09:45pm
I'm reading a book called Survival of the Sickest, and it's really interesting.
It talks about how humans use evolution to create diseases to help us survive longer.

For instance, it talks about how Diabetes was created during the Ice Age to help us battle the extreme cold.


Anyone read it? If not, I'll go in to more detail.
Member
Posts: 72,812
Joined: Apr 11 2007
Gold: 3.00
Trader: Trusted
Dec 12 2008 09:58pm
http://www.survivalofthesickestthebook.com/index.php

O.o

intresting

This post was edited by Djsem on Dec 12 2008 09:59pm
Member
Posts: 29,427
Joined: Sep 17 2007
Gold: 742.59
Dec 12 2008 10:01pm
Quote (Djsem @ Fri, Dec 12 2008, 11:58pm)


Oh, maybe you guys should just read that.. blush.gif
Banned
Posts: 3,660
Joined: Sep 21 2008
Gold: 2.75
Warn: 50%
Dec 12 2008 11:19pm
the book sounds interesting, I might actually buy it
Retired Moderator
Posts: 27,588
Joined: Jul 5 2005
Gold: 505.00
Trader: Trusted
Dec 12 2008 11:23pm
Quote (kegman909650 @ Fri, 12 Dec 2008, 22:45)
I'm reading a book called Survival of the Sickest, and it's really interesting.
It talks about how humans use evolution to create diseases to help us survive longer.

For instance, it talks about how Diabetes was created during the Ice Age to help us battle the extreme cold.


Anyone read it? If not, I'll go in to more detail.


I've heard about the mutually beneficial evolution of humans/other species and internal bacteria/microbiology, but that book sounds like it takes things a lot further. This reminds me of the idea that if you cut certain plants (pruning, etc.), they will feel like they're in trouble, and so they'll see increase growth. The corrolary would be that if you fight a disease, you will fight harder to live; or, perhaps, that when you break a bone, it can for some cases grow heal and become stronger than ever. I don't know if that's part of the basic direction that book has turned toward, because it sounds like the book contains a different discussion, but it's interesting.
Banned
Posts: 3,660
Joined: Sep 21 2008
Gold: 2.75
Warn: 50%
Dec 12 2008 11:26pm
Quote (RewtheBrave @ Sat, Dec 13 2008, 05:23am)
I've heard about the mutually beneficial evolution of humans/other species and internal bacteria/microbiology, but that book sounds like it takes things a lot further. This reminds me of the idea that if you cut certain plants (pruning, etc.), they will feel like they're in trouble, and so they'll see increase growth. The corrolary would be that if you fight a disease, you will fight harder to live; or, perhaps, that when you break a bone, it can for some cases grow heal and become stronger than ever. I don't know if that's part of the basic direction that book has turned toward, because it sounds like the book contains a different discussion, but it's interesting.


lol the movie the happening is a very loose example of that
Banned
Posts: 799
Joined: Sep 5 2008
Gold: 0.01
Warn: 40%
Dec 12 2008 11:30pm
Quote (RewtheBrave @ Sat, Dec 13 2008, 05:23am)
that when you break a bone, it can for some cases grow heal and become stronger than ever. I don't know if that's part of the basic direction that book has turned toward


This is why many martial artists do impact training with their bones. When the bone breaks and heals with that kind of impact, it creates a honeycomb structure that is stronger than before.
Banned
Posts: 3,660
Joined: Sep 21 2008
Gold: 2.75
Warn: 50%
Dec 12 2008 11:31pm
Quote (Cheeeezewiz @ Sat, Dec 13 2008, 05:30am)
This is why many martial artists do impact training with their bones. When the bone breaks and heals with that kind of impact, it creates a honeycomb structure that is stronger than before.


very interesting
Member
Posts: 45,514
Joined: May 28 2007
Gold: 3,209.94
Dec 12 2008 11:40pm
Also the heterozygous genetic condition of having one sickle cell gene (having both will result in the actual disease) is thought to protect against malaria.

EDIT:That makes sense, I should have a word with my teacher then (he explained to us that having the heterozygous condition would provide malaria resistance, and the homozygous condition would provide no advantage, as you'd presumably die of sickle cell anemia).

EDIT:An article on the advantages of being heterozygous, I guess my teacher was right after all happy.gif

http://sickle.bwh.harvard.edu/malaria_sickle.html

This post was edited by Myrddrall9 on Dec 13 2008 12:01am
Banned
Posts: 799
Joined: Sep 5 2008
Gold: 0.01
Warn: 40%
Dec 12 2008 11:43pm
Quote (Myrddrall9 @ Sat, Dec 13 2008, 05:40am)
Also the heterozygous genetic condition of having one sickle cell gene (having both will result in the actual disease) is thought to protect against malaria.


Being a carrier of sickle cell anemia does make one immune to malaria. Has something to do with the jagged shape of the cells making it so malaria isn't able to properly attack the system.

This post was edited by Cheeeezewiz on Dec 12 2008 11:47pm
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
123Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll