Cant really compare them together completely difrent games IMO.

I disagree with the great campaign of cod5.
It's okay

But it feels just like more cod1,2,3 campaign

and that is what I'm fucking sick of.

Multiplayer rocks

Gears2. cod5 sucks canceled my pre-order after playing the beta.

gow 2 all the way

well right now i have both, friend brought over cod5 and i already had gow2, gow2s campaign is amazing, kept me entertained for a few days, so i beat that and now im playing gow2, the only thing bad about gow2 is the fact that it takes a long time to get into games, thats what mainly pisses me off, but eventually that will end when they fix that or more people get the game, as for everybody talking about the chainsaw thing, i dont really know what your talking about, but for nades, i dont really know that either cuz i havent had a problem, but as for COD5, its alright, the thing is though is that any sniper can just like immediately kill you with a chest shot and all the rest of the guns, their effective (and i know this is gonna get commented) cod4>cod5

Just got CoD5.

Ill sum it up quick, the Online is like Cod3 with perks, and no splitscreen.

On campain, there is split screen, but it's so stuidpily done. All teh achivements are for single player too.

I for one was very dissapointed in CoD5, I expected a lot more.

Gears2 by far..
Cod5, i played teh beta then called in and canceled my pre-order.

Gears2 some ppl bitch about lag ect. its all a myth.. only experinced lag once, other then last nite.
But the story line is prety good, Horde is fun and the online is sweet.

COD4 > GoW2 ANYDAY!