Quote (AlphaOmegaX @ Fri, Jul 11 2008, 03:06pm)
I guess I'll get in on the bashing.
Gears is pretty fucking fun offline and online.It's semi-intriguing and brings originality to the mix (already stated)
COD4 is actually fun, I'm really confused as to how people are so mad that people "camp" It's a military-esque shooter. You die by like two gunshot wounds. If you realize someone is camping. Startle them with a stun grenade and knife them. OR, do what you're supposed to do and play with teamwork. It's genuinely fun and time consuming. HQ games are probably the most fun next to Search and Destroy.
Halo 3 is also a decent game. I actually like this one in tangeant with cod4. I think they are both good games, cod4 being better. I can't even begin to count the number of people who have played cod4 after halo3 and only hated it because it was too fast for them or because they didn't have overshields. I am going to point out that the issues that plague halo 3 are the fact that you can only mildly jog to a destination and your best tactic to evade enemy fire is to jump sideways. That in itself is a limiting factor.
Again, all the games being bashed are good but personally I'd play cod4 over any of them. Even gears had a better co-op campaign than halo 3
You point out the flaws in Halo 3 but not in Call of Duty 4. -.-
I didnt quite understand the last sentence
Anyways, id like you to explain more.