Quote (GuyLadouche @ Wed, Jun 17 2009, 09:47am)
Lol you should probably read what i posted again buddy because i didn't say either of those things...
sure im bad at gears 2 (well actually i was decent for the few short weeks i played it when it first came out)
and you are bad at gears 1
You should either read my post again or learn to interpret what you read better...i guess?
Okay kid.
Lol gears 1 is definately way better then gears 2 .
hands down
anyone who likes 2 over 1 just wasnt good at 1.
At least in 1 they made it so host had blood appear on there screen to make seeing enemies harder. This plus the fact that the game play is so much smoother in gears 1 makes me think that the developers spent alot more time/effort in making it. And this shows in the game. GOW2 is a good game but it just doesnt compair to the first in online multiplayer.
The people who were truely good at number 1 would take the first over 2nd anyday, and there are still a few good players still playing number 1.
Bottom line is gears 1 > gow2
n the only time i would play 2 is for gamerscore.
Your bad at 2, your never good at 1. I can play 1 for 1 week and then wreck you.
You cry about blood appearing on host. How sad.
Your philosophy of "Truely" good at gears 1 could take over 2 anyday.
Put a kid in gears 2, and the kid that played gears 1 would get wreck. I mean, if truely he was just that good at gears 1 right scrub?
God, you dont even understand what your typing.
This post was edited by RecenT on Jun 17 2009 04:50am