Quote (DeathMagnetic14 @ 5 Aug 2011 15:46)
just read through all the pages because im lookin for a new build that was cheap, found in stickies, gonna try and make, but there are mainly 4 types of comments i saw,
first off, guide being bashed because they say a smiter is better, well this aint a smiter bro's, guy never said it was a smiter, so stop talking bout your silly ass'd smiters,
Well this guy actually said that the druid is better than a smiter, which about 10 types of bullshit. Oh and he claimed a fancy 98% hit rate. Funny, considering that hit rate is hard capped at 95% and that all the bosses have at least 40% block, which means he's looking at 57% at best. More likely 30-40%. Smiters, on the other hand, have that 95%, and they ignore block, so it stays at 95%.
Oh and also, I know that the druid can't be better than a smiter, because I do my ubers with a zealot. Zeal is Fury on steroids, as it can't be interrupted and paladins are OP, so Zeal > Fury. Ask anyone who knows what Fury does and what Zeal does, they'll agree. Also, I know that Smite > Zeal, from, you know, experience by using those skills. So now we have a chain that goes (Smite > Zeal) and (Zeal > Fury). You know, that leads to Smite > Fury.
So, I win.
Quote
forth was peoples actually tryin to help the man, without being a jerk about it
sadly, those 4 comments are in order, and looks like he was right, nobody gonna want ta make this build no more
Yeah, sorry, I'm kinda short on happy pills. And I generally dislike people who disregard proper math as "nerdy stuff" and then proceed to prance around claiming they're a prophet of truth. That's ridiculous.
I have nothing against people using creative builds to have more fun and lose efficiency. Because really, doing the same thing a billion times gets boring. I like doing PvM with a novamancer instead of a hammerdin. But I don't claim that a Novamancer is better than a Hammerdin, which is what this guy did.
This post was edited by olba on Aug 5 2011 07:46am