Quote (Noob_Nova @ 19 Jul 2010 10:08)
I am the one being trolled against. And the post is serious. You seriously think the math is flawed?
The numbers do work out right.
No assumption had been made on my behalf. I simply demonstrated the game mechanics in what I thought were easy to understand, and irrefutable terms. Apparently the majority population stupidity has procured my failure.
I am the one being trolled against. And the post is serious. You seriously think the math is flawed?
ANYMORE NEGATIVE BASELESS COMMENTS?Yes, the maths is flawed:
Fundamental assumption to the whole thing: 1 damage = 1 life.If this is true, then a build with 2000 damage and 2000 life = a build with 1900 damage and 2100 life = a build with 1800 damage and 2200 life ..... => = a build with 0 damage and 4000 life.
I therefore simply assert that your fundamental assumption is false. It is too simplistic, and fails.