d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo II > Diablo 2 Discussion > Strategy & Guides > Professor's Mage Guide V4.0
Prev1789101116Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 14,928
Joined: Mar 27 2005
Gold: 16.11
Mar 18 2010 03:06pm
Quote (Soka_Gakkai @ Mar 18 2010 04:05pm)
you are not either


ty makes sense

Quote (freddykreuger666 @ Mar 18 2010 04:05pm)
this

east clowns, go back to fuckin school imo


If this retard is @ east, I'll slam him.

This post was edited by drt1245 on Mar 18 2010 03:08pm
Member
Posts: 4,964
Joined: Jul 29 2007
Gold: 400.00
Warn: 10%
Mar 18 2010 03:09pm
Quote (tudey @ 19 Mar 2010 06:04)
yet that sacrifice makes elemental chars do 0 damage to you but you still do damage to them. Sounds fair, yea. You lose almost half of your damage. They lose all of their damage. But hey, you sacrificed your damage for it, its their problem to deal with not doing any damage to you!!

Yea, go ahead and use juvs too. Also use autotp. I'll do that too. Then we both dont die. Sounds great to me.


I beg to differ, it is not correct to say paladin take no damage by using 4 Lo's. The paladin is not even wearing a wisp! Lets take 4 Lo's as the argument. And lets take math out of the topic. I dislike debating with so many theory. Seriously, go duel with 95 in Lo's against a trapper with your Hdin, are you sure paladins take no damage? Are you sure trappers have no way of placing their traps? Are you sure trappers just sit there and camp? Let's all put all dueling tactics and strategies together and argue. We are not taking like asking the trapper to stand like a duck here letting the paladin charge at her openly. I am starting to see your experience in dueling.... I would like to ask you to help by dueling seriously between a paladin and a trapper.

This post was edited by Soka_Gakkai on Mar 18 2010 03:11pm
Member
Posts: 14,928
Joined: Mar 27 2005
Gold: 16.11
Mar 18 2010 03:10pm
Quote (Soka_Gakkai @ Mar 18 2010 04:09pm)
I beg to differ, it is not correct to say we take no damage by using 4 Lo's. Lets take 4 Lo's as the argument. And lets take math out of the topic. I dislike debating with so many theory. Seriously, go duel with 95 in Lo's against a trapper with your Hdin, are you sure paladins take no damage? Are you sure trappers have no way of placing their traps? Are you sure trappers just sit there and camp? Putting all dueling together and argue. We are not taking like asking the trapper to stand here letting the paladin charge at her openly. I am starting to see your experience in dueling.... I would like to ask you to help by dueling seriously between a paladin and a trapper.


Yeah, math works well with logic. Makes since you'd be against that, too (and blow at it, too).

This post was edited by drt1245 on Mar 18 2010 03:10pm
Member
Posts: 4,964
Joined: Jul 29 2007
Gold: 400.00
Warn: 10%
Mar 18 2010 03:11pm
Quote (drt1245 @ 19 Mar 2010 06:10)
Yeah, math works well with logic. Makes since you'd be against that, too (and blow at it, too).


don't theory much. Just duel.
Member
Posts: 35,267
Joined: Feb 9 2005
Gold: 252.00
Mar 18 2010 03:13pm
Quote (Soka_Gakkai @ Mar 18 2010 09:09pm)
I beg to differ, it is not correct to say paladin take no damage by using 4 Lo's. The paladin is not even wearing a wisp! Lets take 4 Lo's as the argument. And lets take math out of the topic. I dislike debating with so many theory. Seriously, go duel with 95 in Lo's against a trapper with your Hdin, are you sure paladins take no damage? Are you sure trappers have no way of placing their traps? Are you sure trappers just sit there and camp? Let's all put all dueling tactics and strategies together and argue. We are not taking like asking the trapper to stand like a duck here letting the paladin charge at her openly. I am starting to see your experience in dueling.... I would like to ask you to help by dueling seriously between a paladin and a trapper.


dudes done the maths already, 16 damage

thats 16 x 5 traps

57 waves of all 5 traps hitting

Member
Posts: 32,368
Joined: Feb 2 2007
Gold: 299.18
Mar 18 2010 03:13pm
Quote (Soka_Gakkai @ 18 Mar 2010 23:09)
I beg to differ, it is not correct to say we take no damage by using 4 Lo's. Lets take 4 Lo's as the argument. And lets take math out of the topic. I dislike debating with so many theory. Seriously, go duel with 95 in Lo's against a trapper with your Hdin, are you sure paladins take no damage? Are you sure trappers have no way of placing their traps? Are you sure trappers just sit there and camp? Putting all dueling together and argue. We are not taking like asking the trapper to stand here letting the paladin charge at her openly. I am starting to see your experience in dueling.... I would like to ask you to help by dueling seriously between a paladin and a trapper.


4 Lo's are totally different thing, you do take like 50 damage with those

but once you add that 20 abs into tg then it gets really silly

Allright, you do damage, but you do like 10 per traphit, how awesome is that!!

You can kill hammers by killing them with just mb. But does that make it fair and balanced? no, not at all

ps. what does placing traps or camping have anything to do with this? They are worthless with such low damage, MB kills palas way faster at that point

This post was edited by tudey on Mar 18 2010 03:15pm
Member
Posts: 31,984
Joined: May 15 2008
Gold: 175.69
Mar 18 2010 03:13pm
Quote (Soka_Gakkai @ Mar 18 2010 04:11pm)
don't theory much. Just duel.


cry
Member
Posts: 29,972
Joined: Jan 31 2005
Gold: 575.00
Mar 18 2010 03:15pm
Quote (freddykreuger666 @ 18 Mar 2010 22:05)
this

east clowns, go back to fuckin school imo


west*

Quote (Soka_Gakkai @ 18 Mar 2010 20:49)
Professor is from my realm, and in my realm 95 max stack with Lo's or T-gods is not bm. Hope it helps to clear things up. We fight constantly the last time with his mage versus our so called 'modern' libby, and it is common for that libby back then uses 20 skills into resist lightning for 95 while desynching and it is perfectly normal for us west.

Debates even went on cc-comp between west and east, where east think 95 is bm and their rules of using t-gods + one wisp is not. but that was before.

Professor have intensive experience with mages, and he is one of the pioneers who came up with es ball sorc guide on cc-comp, where back then jsp don't even exist to most people. And this is the build most people starts using now.

Professor and I duel lots last time, and professor is familiar with our clan. He is speaking in terms of us west non ladder standard where SA, WiZ, tD nX were once active, but don't think you all belongs to west.


I hope the 95 LR rule still doesn't exist on west after people have found out how to utilise wsg to effectively, that would be beyond stupid.
Member
Posts: 4,964
Joined: Jul 29 2007
Gold: 400.00
Warn: 10%
Mar 18 2010 03:15pm
Quote (tudey @ 19 Mar 2010 06:13)
4 Lo's are totally different thing, you do take like 50 damage with those

but once you add that 20 abs into tg then it gets really silly

Allright, you do damage, but you do like 10 per traphit, how awesome is that!!

You can kill hammers by killing them with just mb. But does that make it fair and balanced? no, not at all


Yea it is
Member
Posts: 4,964
Joined: Jul 29 2007
Gold: 400.00
Warn: 10%
Mar 18 2010 03:15pm
Quote (Tails chao @ 19 Mar 2010 06:15)
west*



I hope the 95 LR rule still doesn't exist on west after people have found out how to utilise wsg to effectively, that would be beyond stupid.


Clans are almost non existance anyway. Besides, element characters are not popular in pubs anymore.
Go Back To Strategy & Guides Topic List
Prev1789101116Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll