Quote (gerdi_trade @ Mon, Apr 27 2009, 12:32pm)
when you have ~12k blizz dmg and -260% cold rs and he does not use stacked res, i cannot see the problem.
let's say you have 12 k blizz dmg -> 2k pvp dmg -> he does not have stacked res juust 75% cr -> he has -150% cold res (it's capped there)
then each blizz -> 2000*2,5 = 5000 each hit then he uses 40% abs -> 1000 dmg each hit -> if blizz hits ~2 times when ever you hit him -> he dies in ~3 blizzs.
If you had to use 15+ blizz i can see there is a problem (even tho 15 is still few blizz hits)
there might be mistakes in this post, but think you got the point.
Heh, I didn't know it was capped at -150%. That's lame. Also, 15 blizz hits is a LOT, especially when you consider blizz doesn't always hit, and players can often run through one without any repercussion.
Quote (FnK @ Mon, Apr 27 2009, 02:40pm)
Wow stfu you fucking moron
Nice explanation for your post there buddy. If you're going to just post meaningless insults then kindly get the fuck off my thread. Also you just made yourself look like a fucking moron.
Quote (halo273 @ Mon, Apr 27 2009, 03:05pm)
tbh this crying topic needs to stop.. If you feel your being over absed join a new game or brb with a no abs or resistable char. Because If i was vs you or any blizz or foh char i refuse to die in 1-2 hits vs anyone else its a pointless duel. Another question to you, what if I was vs a mega defensive playing blizz sorc that always stayed 3+ screens away, is acceptable that i die to this in 1-2 hits?
As a barb, there are many ways you could counter this. The sorc cannot hit you from 3 screens away unless they have you namelocked, and they shouldn't be able to get that close anyway (close enough to namelock) without getting teleraped. More often than not the sorc will die in 1-2 WW's, how is this any more acceptable than dying in 1-2 blizzes? Only difference is, physical damage cannot be negated like cold can.
This post was edited by Advariel on Apr 27 2009 09:31am