power point takes few mins.

yeah but you like most people have only tried 1x eth ..

thts more difficult to tell whether its working or not ..

ive tried eth eth .. which should be a very obvious difference from no eth in terms of hit % ..

yet i got no difference at all ..

and that was me having eth eth in my sword for a few days and trying on lots of people ..

what do you think of that ??

I have a paper and test I'm studying for and writing atm

I rather use lo/eth or lo/lo then etheth

i know etheth won't work but eth/lo will work. i know etheth wont work cuz tyler tried it but he did tried eth/lo and lolo but he liked lo/lo better

This post was edited by LilNeko on Oct 25 2010 02:51am

rife fucking sucks

I'm almost done with the paper but studying for this history test is going to be a bitch

im just talking about the number if hits i get with it ..

eth eth HL vs Lo Lo angelics on tap build ..

eth eth HL hits the same as Lo Lo HL in tap duels ..

accept the Lo Lo hits harder ..

but it doesnt hit more .. which it should hit more big time since eth eth > fools for hit % ..

number hits would be Lo Lo > Eth Eth though

Plus you need Lo Lo since your using Cyptic sword..............

if your wep was like zerker then You can tell different.

This post was edited by LilNeko on Oct 25 2010 02:56am

lol that doesnt make sense jess ..

why would number of hits be lo lo HL > eth eth HL ??

i thnk you mean Lo Lo angelics > eth eth HL .. yes this is true ..

im saying this ..

Eth Eth HL = Lo Lo HL in hit % ..

and this would absolutely not be the case if eth was working ..

It make sense?

lo lo hl>eth eth hls by long shot

cyptic sword has terrible min dmg

if you were using zerker it would be different story cuz zerker has extremly high max dmg to cover up the lo's

cuz eth eth + Hl >lo lo in hit %

This post was edited by LilNeko on Oct 25 2010 03:00am