Oh you mean the test that I proved had impossible results with Grief.

You can't try to tell me DS doesn't work with Grief -.-

This post was edited by Voyaging on Mar 21 2012 05:19pm

sigh..

if the theory doesn't match the observations the observations can be false but so can the theory, don't forget that. Maybe there's something more to it than what meets the eye

This post was edited by tudey on Mar 21 2012 05:20pm

Sure I totally agree, but I think it's known fact that deadly strike doubles the damage after +damage from Grief is applied.

this lol.

Its like that neutrino moving faster than the speed of light, it was completely against all the theories, but this does not mean at all that the experiment was wrong, rather it could be that the theory limiting the particle to light speed was wrong.

This post was edited by Jeebus666 on Mar 21 2012 05:25pm

Actually, no, it was proven it was an error in measurement.

wasn't proven 100% no.

well earth being flat was a known fact at one point too most assume that grief works like +min/+max damage and in that context it would be true that deadly strike would double the +damage as well, but that doesn't necessarily mean it holds true without that assumption


Last time I heard about this they suspected it being a measurement error but it was not proven yet at this point, but it's certainly a possibility that probably has a decently large probability. At least I haven't seen any news of it being proven as error yet.

This post was edited by tudey on Mar 21 2012 05:28pm

http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.3433
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/17/science/einstein-proved-right-in-retest-of-neutrinos-speed.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-17364682



No, it was an assumed truth, there was no observational evidence to prove it was flat. It has been tested and I will show sources soon, DS is applied AFTER the +damage is applied, otherwise, why would bvc's possibly ever use highlords?

This post was edited by Voyaging on Mar 21 2012 05:27pm