Get good at this ancient game and I will value your opinion.

e; actually I probably won't ;/

Rock yo bosy..

This post was edited by Botan on Mar 3 2011 01:34pm

you can duel fine without wof but imho its a bad build choice to not get 1 wof on *any* pvp sin.
its 1 point. the benefits of being able to mix in wof in duels far exceeds anything that 1 point could get you. it doesn't make or break assassin to have it or not.. but its still much better to have it.
just like wof trappers should have 1 point ls, ls trappers should have 1 point wof. mixing in wof can help in many stunlock situations, heck sometimes you dont even need wof to hit, just laying a wof down may make an opponent move differently to avoid it and allows you to play on different stunlocking tactics with ls.

also I don't think dave had any sins that didn't have both ls+wof on them. >.>

LLLLLLLOLLLLL

get good pls at this ancient game before posting LLLLLLLOLLLLLLL pls

I see u understood the irony )

LLLLLLLOLLLL indeed.

@first point, I've played a sin for a very long time and having the choice of being able to increase my claw block always feels like a much better choice than pointing wof. Saying it's "much better to have it" is personal opinion and in my opinion nah it's not. Yeah it's 1 point, that can be used elsewhere, in a skill that's actually useful and will be used, not something that is basically purely situational.

@2nd part, I never said he didn't? What's your point?


Wof is too slow and isn't needed, adding your opinion is fine but he's getting attacked for not pointing wof when it's honestly not needed. wof can be used defensively and that's really about it, it's too slow to work against good people on this game with wsg and versus those people I rather have 1% higher wb.

This post was edited by Botan on Mar 3 2011 01:48pm

Its a very useful skill, you cant say its a waste of a skill point



It forces people to wsg much more than ls, and it stuns way better than ls, you cant say no to this (even though wsg will often save you from traps anyway)
And actually wof is faster than ls lol, thats the main idea behind it being better id say (also the fact its wider so cant be avoided like ls lightning)

This post was edited by sevlo on Mar 3 2011 01:51pm

It's a waste, why can't I say that?


e:

Just read this:
And actually wof is faster than ls lol


your opinion is voided, cya


This post was edited by Botan on Mar 3 2011 01:52pm

Because it stuns better than ls, which sometimes proves useful



I really feel it fires faster than ls, 2 wofs alrdy stuns more than 5 ls, but perhaps thats the wider area
At least wof is by far more useful than +1% wb (dont know if it does actually add +1% due to diminishing returns)

This post was edited by sevlo on Mar 3 2011 02:04pm