d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo II > Diablo 2 Discussion > Strategy & Guides > Mechanics Of Life / Mana > Formulae, Calculations, And Comparisons
Prev1456789Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 11,623
Joined: Mar 10 2006
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 90%
Oct 3 2008 05:13am
lol^^

just ignore olba


Quote (eppo @ Fri, Oct 3 2008, 08:32am)
cry cus ownt by olba


b0b 0wn3d



ps: nice work
Member
Posts: 25,580
Joined: May 20 2006
Gold: 843.00
Oct 3 2008 05:20am
Quote (lopov @ Fri, 3 Oct 2008, 13:13)
ps: nice work

Thanks.
Banned
Posts: 3,838
Joined: Mar 25 2008
Gold: 10.00
Warn: 10%
Oct 3 2008 06:46am
Quote (P00 @ Wed, Oct 1 2008, 10:51pm)
what is the meaning of life


chuck norris.
Member
Posts: 7,076
Joined: Jul 4 2006
Gold: 786.40
Oct 3 2008 08:50am
Quote
It's not that you did not give up, I just never replied. And I found replying to you pointless since you're obviously dead set on being right with zero intention of changing your opinion. Which means all that I say is just a way of spending time for you.


That's incredibly amusing. I'm "dead set" on being right? More like you can't fathom conceeding a point. You spent two pages arguing with the guy over semantics - one of the major points you raised against his build was that it failed in the face of BM sorb/maxres, when he responded "No shit, it's a GM build as stated earlier, it fails versus BM maxres/sorb like every other ele build" you began a long, drawn out argument about how "hotspurs can't be BM, because BM implies bad mannered, and an item can't be bad mannered."

The guy wasn't very good at arguing so I gave the obvious response to you via PM - when one says an item is "BM" the implied meaning is that the usage of said item is BM. Hotspurs are virtually universally considered BM sans on Necros/Bowas in a few rulesets - and I'd say those rulesets are outdated, considering the wave of vita zons with high resists/life and Javs/SS on switch built recently. You imply that there was some sort of dialogue between us when you say that I "couldn't be convinced," - you didn't even make an attempt because you knew I was right, and apparently couldn't admit you were wrong. I recall being relatively cheery in the message as well, even agreeing with you that the build was still heavily flawed, and I later sent you a PM with a link to a trade topic of a guy who was selling a well-built fissure druid. Still no response.


Quote
Ah yes, there are usually two kinds of people. Ones cannot do the math, the others cannot bother with it. To me, I knew that there had to be a a solution and an exact formula, but I just never saw any personal use for it and thus never bothered to do it myself.


So if you can't be bothered with it, why complain when someone does it for you? You said the guide was pointless - if someone was unaware of the information presented it either saves them time, or shows them how to develop their own ideas and calculations regarding game mathematics. You whined a lot about the examples he gave - they're not aimed at you or I. I note you conveniently avoided my comparison in your response - again, it's possible for an individual who could figure out the content of the guide without it to still save a significant amount of time and learn more effectively by using a guide. Some may not benefit from it, some may just skim it lazily, but the people who the guide is aimed at and who use it as intended can learn significantly from it.

Quote
I don't mind detailed calculations or focus on calculations. I like them.

As for criticism, unless Fael is god or godlike, he makes mistakes. And mistakes are found via criticism. For example, over-assumptions are very common. Development is what matters. And criticism, if objective and factual, gives a push to that development. Thus, it matters.

Just because some teacher is telling me that my essay sucks does not mean I would stop writing essays for the rest of my life. Heck, just because some teacher gave me a D on geometry does not mean I will stop doing geometry.


Your criticism is simply insulting however, you offer no suggestions for improvement. Not only was your advice near-scathing from the first post, it was awful and contradictory. You told him the examples he presented were "a stupid waste of time," or something to that effect, while they indeed serve the important purpose of introducing those thus unfamiliar with the concepts behind developing game formulae. You then later went on to say he needs to offer proof of the calculations. You need pretty pictures instead of text or something?


I want you to stop right now and ask yourself - "Why am I posting in this thread, and are my posts relevant?"
Member
Posts: 42,832
Joined: Jun 26 2005
Gold: 7.18
Warn: 100%
Oct 3 2008 08:58am
Quote (olba @ Fri, 3 Oct 2008, 09:55)
Oh no. I never said that I wasn't at fault. I do a lot of the boring stuff, too. But there are also times that I do some interesting stuff that I don't end up posting on a forum, which would be because no one ever bothers with the same stuff I do.

As for Grief, there are a whole lot of stupid people who don't understand the math, but at least they will understand the multiplier. If not, then there is truly something gone wrong. And I'm not talking about just missing a few classes in elementary school.

You see, there are people who tend to credit me for the math, but I don't think there is a single time I've said that the math I've ever "published" was complicated at all. Because the way I see it is if I can do it, it's not complicated. After all, I am just a high school kid.


pointless blabbering...

As you can see, there are people which also credit Faelwen for the math. He never said his calculation was complicated whatsoever. So there is absofuckinglutely no point in writing essays in Faelwen´s guide - if you think its to easy and useless why dont you just ignore it?

What a donkey lol
Member
Posts: 1,935
Joined: Jun 3 2008
Gold: 6.22
Oct 3 2008 09:08am
ouchburn
Member
Posts: 3,907
Joined: Feb 14 2006
Gold: 1.50
Oct 3 2008 11:46am
Quote
That's incredibly amusing. I'm "dead set" on being right? More like you can't fathom conceeding a point. You spent two pages arguing with the guy over semantics - one of the major points you raised against his build was that it failed in the face of BM sorb/maxres, when he responded "No shit, it's a GM build as stated earlier, it fails versus BM maxres/sorb like every other ele build" you began a long, drawn out argument about how "hotspurs can't be BM, because BM implies bad mannered, and an item can't be bad mannered."


Yes, "BM sorb", whatever you mean by that, weakens the build. But if you didn't notice, I posted legit ranges of damage for his character, which were a whole lot below the range he had claimed them to be. So either he plays on a different build, as in D2PK, or he's a really bad liar.

Quote
The guy wasn't very good at arguing so I gave the obvious response to you via PM - when one says an item is "BM" the implied meaning is that the usage of said item is BM. Hotspurs are virtually universally considered BM sans on Necros/Bowas in a few rulesets - and I'd say those rulesets are outdated, considering the wave of vita zons with high resists/life and Javs/SS on switch built recently. You imply that there was some sort of dialogue between us when you say that I "couldn't be convinced," - you didn't even make an attempt because you knew I was right, and apparently couldn't admit you were wrong. I recall being relatively cheery in the message as well, even agreeing with you that the build was still heavily flawed, and I later sent you a PM with a link to a trade topic of a guy who was selling a well-built fissure druid. Still no response


Hotspurs being BM is nothing but a stupid assumption. Hell, on my BvC, I have to use freaking Nokozan's because otherwise my Fire Resistances are around 76 with Anyas. And that's with freaking Hotspurs. And yes, I would still say that Nokozan is better at neutralizing damage than Hotspur, mainly because rare boots can have more resistance than rare amulet. It just happens to be that people are too stupid to figure out a way around the loss of 0-20% FCR and whatever +stats, which would be a requirement to using Nokozan. Instead, they can just slap on Hotspur. Looks easier to me.

Actually, Hotspurs being BM or not does not matter to me exactly because Nokozan achieves the same purpose. There is bound to be a time when someone has gone through the trouble of actually being GM and then they will surely have found a way to have 80 or 85% fire resistances.
Quote
So if you can't be bothered with it, why complain when someone does it for you? You said the guide was pointless - if someone was unaware of the information presented it either saves them time, or shows them how to develop their own ideas and calculations regarding game mathematics. You whined a lot about the examples he gave - they're not aimed at you or I. I note you conveniently avoided my comparison in your response - again, it's possible for an individual who could figure out the content of the guide without it to still save a significant amount of time and learn more effectively by using a guide. Some may not benefit from it, some may just skim it lazily, but the people who the guide is aimed at and who use it as intended can learn significantly from it.


Oh, sorry, I never noticed a label that said "If you're stupid, don't read this". You see, the stupid people WILL read it and WILL ask stupid questions because they don't understand it. And again, the people who do should be satisfied with the fact that there has to be a solution. That is, unless they happen come across a situation where they have to optimize their character. And besides, the losses are minimal. Which, again, is something I would like to see in math just because I know that's the way it is.

Quote
Your criticism is simply insulting however, you offer no suggestions for improvement. Not only was your advice near-scathing from the first post, it was awful and contradictory. You told him the examples he presented were "a stupid waste of time," or something to that effect, while they indeed serve the important purpose of introducing those thus unfamiliar with the concepts behind developing game formulae. You then later went on to say he needs to offer proof of the calculations. You need pretty pictures instead of text or something?


I guess you didn't even read my posts. I only said that his posts were a waste of time BECAUSE some stupid moron claimed that the EXAMPLE WAS THE PROOF that the math works. But no, it only showed that the math looks flawless and there is always the possibility that he did the math backwards just to avoid giving a real example, which might end up in a situation where he has to actually think.

Quote
I want you to stop right now and ask yourself - "Why am I posting in this thread, and are my posts relevant?"


Ah, wonderful. Well, I would say that my posts are rather relevant, since so far I am the only one who has said anything about the usage of the math. All the others are just thanking of saying that it's useful. Well, damn, that's kinda obvious. I mean, who the hell makes a formula that does not have a freaking purpose? Oh yeah, the kind of stupid person who wouldn't understand crap about math to begin with. Just because I think that a formula needs mathematical attention, just as a freaking wound needs medical attention instead of something stupid, makes my posts more relevant than all the others in the topic.

Actually, I am glad there is someone else doing some math related to the game. That means that everytime someone comes up with a stupid idea, I won't need to tell them it's stupid, he can do it in a subtle way since he is so much more humane and whatnot.

Oh, and before I forget it, I respect the guy for actually doing the math. Most certainly more than if he just said that "Hey, there is a solution!" So basically I'm here saying that I respect him more than I expect others to respect me, right? Damn, that's kinda tough.

Ok, if you want me to be really, really nice, I'll say it for you. The thing is useful. However, I will only say that it's useful because now the size class of the solution is present. And because it reminded me that I could actually do some gaming math if I can find the free time and effort to write a paper.

And hell no, since I am a human, you won't get any apologies, ever. After all, admitting that I am wrong would be absurd.

This post was edited by olba on Oct 3 2008 11:46am
Member
Posts: 24,249
Joined: Aug 29 2005
Gold: 0.10
Oct 3 2008 12:11pm
Quote (olba @ Fri, Oct 3 2008, 05:46pm)
I guess you didn't even read my posts. I only said that his posts were a waste of time BECAUSE some stupid moron claimed that the EXAMPLE WAS THE PROOF that the math works.


reported

This post was edited by hue_two on Oct 3 2008 12:11pm
Member
Posts: 2,478
Joined: Jul 10 2006
Gold: 50.00
Oct 3 2008 12:31pm
Quote (hue_two @ Fri, 3 Oct 2008, 21:11)
reported


great, now some idiot will close the thread... thanks a lot.
Member
Posts: 24,249
Joined: Aug 29 2005
Gold: 0.10
Oct 3 2008 12:38pm
Quote (ProfessorMoriarty @ Fri, Oct 3 2008, 06:31pm)
great, now some idiot will close the thread... thanks a lot.



They shouldn't close the thead they should just give him a warning or something...

This post was edited by hue_two on Oct 3 2008 12:38pm
Go Back To Strategy & Guides Topic List
Prev1456789Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll