d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo II > Diablo 2 Discussion > Strategy & Guides > Bui's Vindicator/templar Paladin Guide > East Nonladder V/t Paladin
Prev14748495051178Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 49,932
Joined: Apr 30 2004
Gold: 39,662.00
Jul 21 2009 10:51am
Quote (myfryhole @ Tue, Jul 21 2009, 12:49pm)
see it may come down to the player but I disagree if the t/v switches to his cta stick and his griff the v/t will have to compensate with res gear and this leaves him weaker to smite.
both builds are all about balance.


na he cant use griffs, he'd lose life + dr

but i dunno... erik and dave used t/vs i believe and they were #1 and #2 on old school ladder. they had 5556foh so they had to be t/vs

bib altho im not sure what he is is really gg too

This post was edited by Azn Masta on Jul 21 2009 10:53am
Member
Posts: 5,481
Joined: Dec 4 2005
Gold: 58.00
Jul 21 2009 10:52am
Quote (ashwinthegrim @ Tue, Jul 21 2009, 04:37pm)
the smite damage is useless against hammerdins, unless the hammerdin is retarded.. most of VT vs hammerdin matchup would be like a foher vs hammerdin, and only after forcing the hammerdin to make a mistake, you can use smite to go in for the kill.. imo if you go straight through, you'll just get owned by the invi hammerfields..


The thing is what is foh going to do with a light res build 85% light res + wisp on a well stacked hammerdin? The thing is its not like foh vs hammer as if you stomp you eat a faceful of smite on the other hand some of the good v/ts ive faced mixed in desync smite as well as delayed blindspot smiting. With just the standard go south and foh and smite air does not work vs decent players..

This post was edited by halo273 on Jul 21 2009 10:54am
Member
Posts: 28,769
Joined: Apr 22 2008
Gold: 351.01
Jul 21 2009 10:52am
Quote (myfryhole @ Tue, Jul 21 2009, 12:49pm)
see it may come down to the player but I disagree if the t/v switches to his cta stick and his griff the v/t will have to compensate with res gear and this leaves him weaker to smite.
both builds are all about balance.


if the T/v switch to cta he will die fast. Even worst if he's using griff

lol
Banned
Posts: 63
Joined: Jul 20 2009
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 10%
Jul 21 2009 10:54am
Quote (myfryhole @ Tue, Jul 21 2009, 05:45pm)
I have a very similar T/v build to his(only I get my -150 conviction) and with a grief/ ber shako setup I break 5k foh keep in mind thats w/o my foh cta or a torch. I had a v/t as well but with -150 conviction and maxed foh there is def a difference. and if u maxed smite and hs I don't see ur foh standing up vs a t/v's mainly due to conviction differences.


europe vt vs vt setup is like different world for east players, we have 35% slow, stacked ias to counter opponents slow,life tap, stacked res, max dr, hl for extra ds + some extra lr, also using oak from whisp is pretty standard
tv's cant match this
btw if u didnt know there exist someting like conv bug, u can easily nagate opponents higher conv with your lower one

This post was edited by Flipme on Jul 21 2009 11:07am
Member
Posts: 5,481
Joined: Dec 4 2005
Gold: 58.00
Jul 21 2009 10:55am
Quote (Aube @ Tue, Jul 21 2009, 04:52pm)
if the T/v switch to cta he will die fast. Even worst if he's using griff

lol


agree with this switching means he will lose his smite dmg if hes cought with scepter out then on the other hand he losses pdr + life from using griffons meaning he will be cut down in seconds

yeah flashing conviction is a bug that means the server can't tell who has the higher conviction still quite usefull in dueling.. especially duels like this

This post was edited by halo273 on Jul 21 2009 10:57am
Member
Posts: 4,943
Joined: Feb 20 2009
Gold: 4.20
Jul 21 2009 11:02am
If a t/v hits w and has griff he becomes a foh basically u w smite when distance is closed. I have never had a problem doing this mainly because the foh damage hurts enough that 1 foh and most will charge u desperately. if the other player acts impulsively like this you get the upper hand. and conviction bug has never given me an issue with this possibly bc ladder vts don't know how to use it.
Member
Posts: 28,769
Joined: Apr 22 2008
Gold: 351.01
Jul 21 2009 11:04am
Quote (myfryhole @ Tue, Jul 21 2009, 01:02pm)
If a t/v hits w and has griff he becomes a foh basically u w smite when distance is closed. I have never had a problem doing this mainly because the foh damage hurts enough that 1 foh and most will charge u desperately. if the other player acts impulsively like this you get the upper hand. and conviction bug has never given me an issue with this possibly bc ladder vts don't know how to use it.


Vt> foh whats your point?

charge? you'll get a tele smite in the face if you start with defensive foh
Member
Posts: 49,932
Joined: Apr 30 2004
Gold: 39,662.00
Jul 21 2009 11:05am
Quote (myfryhole @ Tue, Jul 21 2009, 01:02pm)
If a t/v hits w and has griff he becomes a foh basically u w smite when distance is closed. I have never had a problem doing this mainly because the foh damage hurts enough that 1 foh and most will charge u desperately. if the other player acts impulsively like this you get the upper hand. and conviction bug has never given me an issue with this possibly bc ladder vts don't know how to use it.


you cant use griffs in vt vs vt.... the lack of dr + life will get you killed.

as for them charging at your blindly.. yea that play style is very common. once u foh them once of twice, they will charge to try and smite you. flash hf and synch away throwin random fohs and synching smiting them back b4 runnin away again.

its kinda hard to explain... vt vs vt is mostly about timing and experience and a good namelocks (no misclicks etc)

This post was edited by Azn Masta on Jul 21 2009 11:05am
Member
Posts: 31,209
Joined: Sep 26 2008
Gold: 0.00
Jul 21 2009 02:30pm
Quote (Flipme @ Tue, Jul 21 2009, 08:15am)
u are obviously too stupid to realize that this moron was compering on screen damages of not maxed smite vs maxed one


http://forums.d2jsp.org/index.php?showtopic=3532193

^ Using this as a calculator and assuming we're using shako, 9x pcombs, nigma, + 2 skill ammy, grief, hoz, dungos, some rings, some boots:

15 points into smite (What bui suggested in his guide):

191 - 194 (base damage on up'd hoz)
153-156 (lvl 44 holy shield)
400 damage from grief
744 - 750 damage

585% ed from smite (lvl 39)
200% ed from strength (200's a nice even number, it could be +/- a few points)
594% ed from fanatacism (lvl 33)
1379% ed total
=


11,003 - 11,092 (11,047 average) total total smite damage.

Now if we used the same set-up, but max smite:

Base damage remains the same as above

660% ed from smite (lvl 44)
200% ed from strength (200's a nice even number)
594% ed from fanatacism (lvl 33)
1454% ed total

=


11,561 - 11,655 (11,608 average) total smite damage

= 561 difference

561 / 6 (pvp penalty) = 93 damage
93 / 2 (50% dr on opponent) = 46 damage

My argument is still the same.

I used on-screen damage because, well, it's easier than having to go through and calculate it. That number is off by a little bit (I just used an estimate for strength, and the damage is higher with 2x bks, which I didn't include), but the point doesn't change.

I think you're the moron for requiring me to spell it out for you.
Member
Posts: 49,932
Joined: Apr 30 2004
Gold: 39,662.00
Jul 21 2009 02:33pm
Quote (sylvannos @ Tue, Jul 21 2009, 04:30pm)
http://forums.d2jsp.org/index.php?showtopic=3532193

^ Using this as a calculator and assuming we're using shako, 9x pcombs, nigma, + 2 skill ammy, grief, hoz, dungos, some rings, some boots:

15 points into smite (What bui suggested in his guide):
191 - 194 (base damage on up'd hoz)
153-156 (lvl 44 holy shield)
400 damage from grief
744 - 750 damage

585% ed from smite (lvl 39)
200% ed from strength (200's a nice even number, it could be +/- a few points)
594% ed from fanatacism (lvl 33)
1379% ed total
=


11,003 - 11,092 (11,047 average) total total smite damage.

Now if we used the same set-up, but max smite:

Base damage remains the same as above

660% ed from smite (lvl 44)
200% ed from strength (200's a nice even number)
594% ed from fanatacism (lvl 33)
1454% ed total

=


11,561 - 11,655 (11,608 average) total smite damage

= 561 difference

561 / 6 (pvp penalty) = 93 damage
93 / 2 (50% dr on opponent) =46 damage

My argument is still the same.

I used on-screen damage because, well, it's easier than having to go through and calculate it. That number is off by a little bit (I just used an estimate for strength, and the damage is higher with 2x bks, which I didn't include), but the point doesn't change.

I think you're the moron for requiring me to spell it out for you.


yea but thats 46 damage vs 4000 defense xD

46 damage wont make that much of a difference if you are slamming someone with smite up against a wall. but 4000 defensive can mean a hit or a miss. also dont u get 1% more block too?

This post was edited by Azn Masta on Jul 21 2009 02:34pm
Go Back To Strategy & Guides Topic List
Prev14748495051178Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll