Quote (Soccergoal10 @ Tue, Jul 21 2009, 11:50am)
thats his point i think. You either make him weaker by swapping out gear. or make him weaker by wearing him down... or both
yep pretty much. if they stack against my foh, they lose something else to do so. and if they dont, then my foh hurts them a lot
its win/win for me. but for a vt. just for comparison sake im gonna use a hdin. if they counter your foh with a tgod or something + stack you basically turn into a pure smiter... and as we all know a good hdin > a good pure smiter
Quote (Flipme @ Tue, Jul 21 2009, 11:49am)
well vs stacked opponents i usually end up fohing maybe 5 times and like 95%of my dmg comes from smite
foh is nice to force people to stack and use abs (less dr etc), but then its pretty useless
eh, i wouldnt say so. vs like a barb, the forcing to use tgod makes em lose 40vita + 10fhr + life rep + dr mod from dungos. plus, even with full stack and 1 piece of sorb. the foh can still hurt quite a bit over time. just like a sin's mindblast. while the initial hit may not hurt much. over the course of time, it can pk people purely from that
Quote (ashwinthegrim @ Tue, Jul 21 2009, 11:56am)
ahh, now you see it.. you need a strong foh to make them stack and use abs (less DR).. with a weak foh, they won't be hurt much, so they'll end up using their DR gear, which makes your smite less effective..
by having a strong foh, you ensure that they're forced to give up their DR for stack/abs, which makes your smite far more effective, even though your actual smite damage is lower than that of a pure smiter..
and this is the reason, VT vs smiter duels are generally biased towards the VT winning.. coz he forces the smiter to use stack/DR, and because of that, the VT's smite becomes more effective than the smiter's smite..
correct
This post was edited by Azn Masta on Jul 21 2009 09:58am