Quote (ashwinthegrim @ Tue, Jul 21 2009, 04:17pm)
and scale it up.. add in the pvp penalty, and the 50 DR, it would still be negligible.. and while leaving comments, include the REASONING behind your comments..
for ex:
since your resists are low, you will have trouble against elemental damage based chars
is much better than:
failed build
EDIT::
did you notice that his build had a significantly stronger foh compared to a V/T's foh? while the smite damage is negligible, the added foh damage comes in useful against hammerdins, and builds that like to stay back and camp..
read few pages ago somebody already did the math and the dmg difference wasnt so neglible as u say
besides funny how you mention about pvp penalty and dr here and always keep forgeting about it when mentining the dmg increase on foh haha
"and scale it up.. add in the pvp penalty, and the 85%res (or any abs), it would still be negligible.. and while leaving comments, include the REASONING behind your comments.."
FYP
This post was edited by Flipme on Jul 21 2009 09:40am