Quote (Noob_Nova @ 23 Jul 2010 00:57)

Does it make sense to readdress a previously covered point?

You are suggesting that it does.

So one could say that it makes sense to you, to do the same thing over and over again and expect difference results.



Main Entry: ob·ses·sion
Pronunciation: \äb-ˈse-shən, əb-\
Function: noun
Date: 1680

1 : a persistent disturbing preoccupation with an often unreasonable idea or feeling; broadly : compelling motivation <an obsession with profits>
2 : something that causes an obsession

— ob·ses·sion·al \-ˈsesh-nəl, -ˈse-shə-nəl\ adjective

— ob·ses·sion·al·ly adverb

Reference:

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/obsession






Main Entry: 1cra·zy
Pronunciation: \ˈkrā-zē\
Function: adjective
Inflected Form(s): cra·zi·er; cra·zi·est
Date: 1566

1 a : full of cracks or flaws : unsound <they were very crazy, wretched cabins — Charles Dickens> b : crooked, askew
2 a : mad, insane <yelling like a crazy man> b (1) : impractical <a crazy plan> (2) : erratic <crazy drivers> c : being out of the ordinary : unusual <a taste for crazy hats>
3 a : distracted with desire or excitement <a thrill-crazy mob> b : absurdly fond : infatuated <he's crazy about the girl> c : passionately preoccupied : obsessed <crazy about boats>

— cra·zi·ly \-zə-lē\ adverb

— cra·zi·ness \-zē-nəs\ noun

— like crazy : to an extreme degree <everyone dancing like crazy>

reference:

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/crazy

Quote

Does it make sense to readdress a previously covered point?

Quote (Meadow @ Jul 22 2010 08:00pm)

but it doesnt mean shit in the real world...i think its funny to watch people rage over a stupid game

Quote (Noob_Nova @ 23 Jul 2010 01:00)

but thanks for recognizing that I am using Logic.

Quote (Q_r @ Jul 22 2010 08:00pm)

*

Yeah it's actually sensefull, since you are the only who still believes that you were right from scratch. The, the point has been covered, yes, but then we found out that you were wrong about pretty much everything. Obsession is honestly the word that discribes you the better.

Quote (Noob_Nova @ 23 Jul 2010 01:07)

Ok thanks for telling us about beliefs

No one has found the assertion to be wrong. One person came close. In fact it was not proven wrong.

Please link the topic page where irrefutable proof supporting your argument exists. I have read every page. It does not exist.

I am not obsessing. Unless seeking the truth is an obsession. You are obsessing about your pelt.

We have already determined that any observation made on reality, by you, is in error due to an incompetence in accurately observing reality in conjunction to senseless thinking, possible insanity, and any other unknown variables.

Anyone interested in assessing facts now?

Quote (Q_r @ Jul 22 2010 08:05pm)

I did not use the adjective "logical" towards you, but towards the pre-made sentences that you enjoy using. They are actually always irrelevant with the context

Quote (Q_r @ Jul 22 2010 07:48pm)

And yeah, you're again avoiding the main subject, by using pre-made logical stereotypes, such as the whole red text above

Quote (Noob_Nova @ Jul 22 2010 08:00pm)

but thanks for recognizing that I am using Logic.

Quote (Noob_Nova @ 23 Jul 2010 01:13)

Then what is this?





Its incoherence on your behalf.

Also, did you not suggest that we do not argue semantics in the first place?

Now you want to argue semantics because it is relevant.

What exactly are you trying to prove?

That you can not make a coherent argument.

Quote (Q_r @ Jul 22 2010 08:09pm)

You just proved how blind you are... Just re-read the previous 40pages of solid counter-arguments which progressively destroyed your statement.

We ? You're skyzophrenic ?

Quote (Q_r @ Jul 22 2010 08:20pm)

You should go sleeping, you seem to be tired.
1) Repeating what i said, the logical adjective did not refer to your person, but to the pre-made & handy sentences you used.
2) No it's not me, you again proved your low skills at reading.

Quote (Noob_Nova @ 23 Jul 2010 01:26)

No one has proven anything other then myself.



1.

Main Entry: 1proof
Pronunciation: \ˈprüf\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English prof, prove, alteration of preve, from Anglo-French preove, from Late Latin proba, from Latin probare to prove — more at prove
Date: 13th century

1 a : the cogency of evidence that compels acceptance by the mind of a truth or a fact b : the process or an instance of establishing the validity of a statement especially by derivation from other statements in accordance with principles of reasoning
2 obsolete : experience
3 : something that induces certainty or establishes validity
4 archaic : the quality or state of having been tested or tried; especially : unyielding hardness
5 : evidence operating to determine the finding or judgment of a tribunal
6 a plural proofs or proof : a copy (as of typeset text) made for examination or correction b : a test impression of an engraving, etching, or lithograph c : a coin that is struck from a highly polished die on a polished planchet, is not intended for circulation, and sometimes differs in metallic content from coins of identical design struck for circulation d : a test photographic print made from a negative
7 : a test applied to articles or substances to determine whether they are of standard or satisfactory quality
8 a : the minimum alcoholic strength of proof spirit b : strength with reference to the standard for proof spirit; specifically : alcoholic strength indicated by a number that is twice the percent by volume of alcohol present <whiskey of 90 proof is 45 percent alcohol>

Reference:

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/proof

1) no one other the myself has provided evidence
2) ?
3) pretty sure i induced certainty
4) tested? yep i tested it
5) once again evidence. where is the evidence that you speak of? k thanks
6) does not apply
7) does not apply
8) does not apply

You think that there are 40 pages of solid counter-arguments which have progressively destroyed my statement.

Main Entry: ar·gue
Pronunciation: \ˈär-(ˌ)gyü\
Function: verb
Inflected Form(s): ar·gued; ar·gu·ing
Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French arguer to reprove, argue & Latin arguere to demonstrate, prove; Anglo-French arguer, from Latin argutare to prate, frequentative of arguere; akin to Hittite arkuwai- to plead, respond
Date: 14th century

intransitive verb 1 : to give reasons for or against something : reason <argue for a new policy>
2 : to contend or disagree in words: dispute <argue about money>transitive verb 1 : to give evidence of : indicate <the facts argue his innocence>
2 : to consider the pros and cons of : discuss <argue an issue>
3 : to prove or try to prove by giving reasons: maintain <asking for a chance to argue his case>
4 : to persuade by giving reasons : induce<couldn't argue her out of going>
The definitions of argue highlighted in red are the 40 so called pages that you will find in this post that you are talking about

None of these types of arguments prove anything.

My argument is supported with proof


Also note that this non medical professional has made the diagnostic that I must be schizophrenic.