[QUOTE=Noob_Nova,Jul 22 2010 04:04pm][QUOTE=Q_r,Jul 22 2010 06:48pm]Yeah, me too, that's why i'm expecting sense from you[/QUOTE]

I am making sense, but you are thinking senselessly, and therefore unable to understand, or perceive my thinking as sensible.

[Quote (Q_r @ Jul 22 2010 06:48pm)]Yeah, me too, that's why i'm NOTexpecting sense from you

e/ typo =/[/QUOTE]

Oh now you want to change your argument? That's pretty senseless, but that's ok:

[QUOTE=Q_r,Jul 22 2010 06:48pm]Yeah, me too, that's why i'm NOTexpecting sense from you

e/ typo =/[/QUOTE]

I am making sense, but you are thinking senselessly, and therefore unable to understand, or perceive my thinking as sensible.[/QUOTE]

This is a pointless waste of bandwidth

Why doesn't, "your noob, im good, im wrong, i brought mathematical arguments, based on reason, your stfu you best... "
Enough," make any sense?

Can anyone legitimately make any sense of this statement?

I deduce that you, Q_r, have provided another example of your insensible nature in thinking on this subject matter.

Interesting.

[QUOTE=iChapter,Jul 22 2010 07:10pm][QUOTE=Noob_Nova,Jul 22 2010 04:04pm][QUOTE=Q_r,Jul 22 2010 06:48pm]Yeah, me too, that's why i'm expecting sense from you[/QUOTE]

I am making sense, but you are thinking senselessly, and therefore unable to understand, or perceive my thinking as sensible.

[Quote (Q_r @ Jul 22 2010 06:48pm)]Yeah, me too, that's why i'm NOTexpecting sense from you

e/ typo =/[/QUOTE]

Oh now you want to change your argument? That's pretty senseless, but that's ok:

[QUOTE=Q_r,Jul 22 2010 06:48pm]Yeah, me too, that's why i'm NOTexpecting sense from you

e/ typo =/[/QUOTE]

I am making sense, but you are thinking senselessly, and therefore unable to understand, or perceive my thinking as sensible.[/QUOTE]

This is a pointless waste of bandwidth[/QUOTE]

I bet from this, and previous posts, we can determine who is a multi. The muliple accounts created to by pass a "scammer lock."

GTFO scammer.

[QUOTE=iChapter

This post was edited by Noob_Nova on Jul 22 2010 05:15pm

Lol, how retarded are you... The "xxxxx" sentence is taken from your own ones dude xD

You did not cite a literal quote.

You regurgitated your own perception of my statements.

The "quote" is in error because it was subjected to your faulty perception of reality.

Anyone interested in confirming this can scroll back through all of the pages and in fact see that none exist to where I wrote what you have claimed the "quoted" statements are derived from.

Those in the quotation were your own words; indicative of your own erroneous perception.

This post was edited by Noob_Nova on Jul 22 2010 05:23pm

Noob_Nova
Group: Members
Posts: 2,476
Joined: Mar 24 2010
Gold: 1,851.13
Trader: Not Rated
Warn: 0%

I actually sumed up what you pretty much said over the last ~100 pages, by listing them.

wow i didn't realize we were playing JSP

by your logic you must have start playing D2 in 2004

That makes you a noob.

another example of your "logic" can be found on page 32 of this thread:



YOU FORGOT TO PUT SOMETHING IN JALAL'S TO MAKE AN EQUAL COMPARISON YOU STUPID FUCKING NOOB

YOU FAILED TO READ; AND THEREFORE SEE THAT ANY PELT LACKING A RESIST ALL MOD IS < JALAL'S YOU STUPID NOOB

YOU FAILED TO READ THAT 40 BO LIFE IS < +2 BO + 142 LIFE FROM SHAKO YOU STUPID NOOB

THE PELT IN YOUR COMPARISON IS FAKE YOU STUPID NOOB.

xD Com'on dude, you said by yourself that you ALWAYS use a jalals on a druid, why are you comparing a single pelt to both jalals and shako, and it's more than obvious (and you loudly admitted it) that circ/pelt/coa combo >>>> Jalals or shako