ergo you are dumb since writing it once would have been enough.

Well I gave them an abridged version of the longer version I was writing. I only had like 2 people request it, and I think both of them donated extra fg afterwards. I've actually made a lot more fg on the guide now that it's released, I've had quite a few donors and gotten hundreds of fg for it. nothing compared to the time it takes, ofc, but still nice.

gd, was not hard

and yet, not a single one of those posts has any actual suggestions for what to change. they're all just childish insults, exactly like i said. oh well. try harder next time i suppose.

This post was edited by darcanegel on Jul 19 2008 02:15pm

perhaps you should learn to read.

suggestions include: developing actual talent before making sweeping assertions as to the abilities of your impaired character. this includes the use of griffons over valk and your groundless statements regarding frw, especially since you fail to address scenarios where 30frw makes an immense difference, i.e. svd, tpk, etc.

gd, but it wasnt challenging at all

i need your iq, pm me how much fg you need ^^

well, it's very nice that you're trying, but really, you ought to wait until your testicles drop before you start handing out advice. and btw, none of your posts said anything explicit regarding griffs vs valk anyway but nice try at covering your ass.

even if (and...again...this is a huge enormous if) valk was better than griffs, I'd still use griffs for the guide. It's faaaar cheaper, and it exists on ladder (personally i hate ladder but I know there's lots of people who have made this on ladder). Valk guides are useless to 98% of the people on jsp.

besides that, nothing I've said about 30% frw is "groundless". the numbers I've posted are FACTS. If you, personally, feel that 5% efrw is a major difference in duels, then USE YOUR FUCKING UGLY-ASS VALK. I sure don't care. frw can't really be compared to other stats like damage or life or res, so if you think that 5% efrw is a major improvement for the build, then I don't have any arguments for you. Use it. Personally, I don't think it's that useful, so I don't use valk. But it's completely, entirely a matter of opinion.

I can't totally remember tbh, someone told me a long time ago but I forgot. My SAT was 2180 though, maybe that gives some idea.

its kinda hilarious that you still discuss about valk vs griff although it was stated a couple of times now that both are viable.
and they are equally viable, period.

and somehow he is right, valk guide for europe e.g. would mean to write a guide for 2 hands full of people. Gz.

moe and i play our trapper with griffons, although we could have bought a valk, and that decision was based on the decision that switch-ability is more important to us.

This post was edited by harry_haller on Jul 19 2008 02:31pm

you are dumb as fuck

resorting to ad hominem attacks because you are getting flamed for a horrible guide is laughable, but pathetic.
they are explicit references to valk v griffons, i was just too lazy to chainquote.
numbers dont matter, ACTUAL EXPERIENCE in dueling shows that the difference is there.
of course you would fail to realize that, owing to your considerations of faun as a top bvc, lol?
its not a matter of opinion, its fact.
before you can make anything close to a sweeping assertion of what a good assassin is, you should actual sample the populace for good duelers, that would make you realize how impractical and shitty your character and consequently, your guide are.
2180 sat lol?
1510 on the old system, with a 750 in writing would be a 2260, l8.
168 LSAT
never get big again trick