d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo II > Diablo 2 Discussion > Strategy & Guides > Math Behind Amp Vs Dr
Prev1323334353660Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 1,555
Joined: Sep 22 2011
Gold: 33.00
Nov 26 2017 05:32pm
Quote (lilith0 @ Nov 26 2017 11:07am)
read post#277 for a chance to become less retarded


since you cant let go of being embarrased on your precious subforum

in WHAT WORLD, would you rather take damage (whether you are amped or not) WITHOUT damage reduction and consider that a good thing??

obvioulsy you want to have damage reduction, this whole threads purpose is to ask whether you get 100% more dmg with amplify, or 50% more, and the ANSWER is 50% more damage with DR

so you can confuse yourself over and over in your circular logic, but what i just explained is the answer, its NOT 3x the damage with DR and amped :bonk:
Member
Posts: 26,529
Joined: Nov 18 2013
Gold: 20,241.01
Nov 26 2017 05:42pm
Quote (triunes @ Nov 26 2017 03:32pm)
since you cant let go of being embarrased on your precious subforum

in WHAT WORLD, would you rather take damage (whether you are amped or not) WITHOUT damage reduction and consider that a good thing??

obvioulsy you want to have damage reduction, this whole threads purpose is to ask whether you get 100% more dmg with amplify, or 50% more, and the ANSWER is 50% more damage with DR

so you can confuse yourself over and over in your circular logic, but what i just explained is the answer, its NOT 3x the damage with DR and amped :bonk:


1500/3 bud.

We never said it's better or worse. We said you EFFECTIVELY take triple damage.
Member
Posts: 1,555
Joined: Sep 22 2011
Gold: 33.00
Nov 26 2017 05:43pm
Quote (Vilify @ Nov 26 2017 06:42pm)
1500/3 bud.

We never said it's better or worse. We said you EFFECTIVELY take triple damage.


but your not taking triple damage..
Member
Posts: 26,529
Joined: Nov 18 2013
Gold: 20,241.01
Nov 26 2017 05:44pm
Quote (triunes @ Nov 26 2017 03:43pm)
but your not taking triple damage..


In both equations you are taking dr into account.

With 0 dr the equation doesn't change. So 1000 stays 1000 after DR is taken into account, which then turns into to 2k because there is no + or - % except from amp. So it's double.

With 50 dr the equation changes. 1000 turns into 500 which then turns into 1500, which is triple the 500 you'd have taken. So it's triple, albeit a smaller number.

The amount is lesser, yes, but it's still triple..


Triple of 2 is 6 but double of 4 is 8 for example.

This post was edited by Vilify on Nov 26 2017 05:48pm
Member
Posts: 1,555
Joined: Sep 22 2011
Gold: 33.00
Nov 26 2017 05:56pm
Quote (Vilify @ Nov 26 2017 06:44pm)
In both equations you are taking dr into account.

With 0 dr the equation doesn't change. So 1000 stays 1000 after DR is taken into account, which then turns into to 2k because there is no + or - % except from amp. So it's double.

With 50 dr the equation changes. 1000 turns into 500 which then turns into 1500, which is triple the 500 you'd have taken. So it's triple, albeit a smaller number.

The amount is lesser, yes, but it's still triple..


Triple of 2 is 6 but double of 4 is 8 for example.


this is where you guys are not using your noggin, the whole question at hand is talking about Dam reduction effect on amplified damage,

so you dont do that conversion , your keep talking in terms of the original damage , where 1000 > 2000, and then 1000 > 1500. period.


thats it, your making extra conversions ans calculation that are not needed or add any value to the answer.
\

so its 1.5x not triple,

i mustve explained this a dozen times,

you guys are like Hilary supporters, you live in this make believe false reality, only cause your have this chorus of weak limp wristed wannabes who cant think, and so you just go deeper and deeper into this madness, like leoric, well its TIME FOR A WAKE UP CALL

Member
Posts: 66,871
Joined: Feb 24 2009
Gold: 250.00
Warn: 10%
Nov 26 2017 06:03pm
Quote (triunes @ Nov 26 2017 03:56pm)
this is where you guys are not using your noggin, the whole question at hand is talking about Dam reduction effect on amplified damage,

so you dont do that conversion , your keep talking in terms of the original damage , where 1000 > 2000, and then 1000 > 1500. period.


thats it, your making extra conversions ans calculation that are not needed or add any value to the answer.
\

so its 1.5x not triple,

i mustve explained this a dozen times,

you guys are like Hilary supporters, you live in this make believe false reality, only cause your have this chorus of weak limp wristed wannabes who cant think, and so you just go deeper and deeper into this madness, like leoric, well its TIME FOR A WAKE UP CALL


:bonk:
Member
Posts: 26,529
Joined: Nov 18 2013
Gold: 20,241.01
Nov 26 2017 06:16pm
Quote (triunes @ Nov 26 2017 03:56pm)
this is where you guys are not using your noggin, the whole question at hand is talking about Dam reduction effect on amplified damage,

so you dont do that conversion , your keep talking in terms of the original damage , where 1000 > 2000, and then 1000 > 1500. period.


thats it, your making extra conversions ans calculation that are not needed or add any value to the answer.
\

so its 1.5x not triple,

i mustve explained this a dozen times,

you guys are like Hilary supporters, you live in this make believe false reality, only cause your have this chorus of weak limp wristed wannabes who cant think, and so you just go deeper and deeper into this madness, like leoric, well its TIME FOR A WAKE UP CALL


The second number on the first equation is 1,000.
The second number on the second equation is 500.

You take triple what you WOULD HAVE TAKEN WITH WITH WITH WITH WITH 50% DR.
Member
Posts: 19,102
Joined: Jan 16 2012
Gold: 3,854.69
Nov 27 2017 12:31pm
Quote (triunes @ Nov 27 2017 12:32am)
since you cant let go of being embarrased on your precious subforum

in WHAT WORLD, would you rather take damage (whether you are amped or not) WITHOUT damage reduction and consider that a good thing??

obvioulsy you want to have damage reduction, this whole threads purpose is to ask whether you get 100% more dmg with amplify, or 50% more, and the ANSWER is 50% more damage with DR

so you can confuse yourself over and over in your circular logic, but what i just explained is the answer, its NOT 3x the damage with DR and amped :bonk:


i never talked about taking damage
i talked about hitting stuff
and you still didn't answer the question
Retired Moderator
Posts: 5,210
Joined: Aug 30 2017
Gold: 3,392.41
Trader: Trusted
Nov 28 2017 03:16am
Wow.
I did read this topic at full last night. Couldn't stop laughing.
I had to post 12 hours after because my brain did explode at the time being.
Member
Posts: 91,169
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,504.69
Nov 28 2017 07:49am
basically what we have here is a 5th grader who got tricked by a math question that had a little twist. the teacher first planned it as a fun activity to explore math and language. then the idiot in the back who couldn't figure it out for 20 minutes gets mad that they got tricked by a trick question. so they spend the rest of the class explaining how the trick works, but that it shouldn't work, because they shouldn't be trying to trick people.

you sir are pathetic, you got tricked by a little language puzzle, get over it.
Go Back To Strategy & Guides Topic List
Prev1323334353660Next
Closed New Topic New Poll