Most stupid guy ever spawned in this forum section i guess

you fail at logic.

bolding sentences and insulting people on a virtual website won't make u good in any way lol^^

but yeah, keep sweating on ur chair and wasting time on trying to back up false theories about jalals etc

if i was you, i would stop bumping this piece of trash thread already

is it a false theory?

as I recall it was a rational explanation demonstrated with mathematical models

If it is so false then please present your rational explanation in the same fashion.

Simply using hand down information such as "jalal's blows rox keke," which is apparently derived from a source that had been wrong in the first place, and then transmitted by word of mouth, is not a rational explanation. I know you think it is. I can assure you that it is not.

K waiting.

This post was edited by Noob_Nova on Jul 22 2010 04:03pm

if u really have the nerves of calling those methods u used as "mathematical models" i will surely laugh irl ;D

I have followed the entire first thread, where you shew us your "rational explanation desmonstrated with mathematical models"... I also remember that every single point of your theory, has been destroyed by arguments that you even admitted. You said that you had forgotten somethings, etc... Now, how can you keep thinking that your theory was right ?
We proved you that, only relying on pure stats, 2/3/10/xx/2 pelts >>> Jalals. We also proved you that, relying on full gear, 2/3/10/xx/2 pelts >>>> jalals (which revealed to be useless).
Anything else to say ?

Oh wait, you'll answer something like : your a noob, i'm playing this game since 1.09 noob keke ? im the best, i cannot be wrong, your missing logical

Ahahaha, stop kidding yourself.



Rationality does not imply correctness.

For example, you're ignoring the usage of a +5 helm, which would mostly be used in druid vs druid, in which case the tradeoff of damage vs life might be worth it.

Dude, you need to stop arguing about the correctness of your methods. Get your head out of your ass, wasting time trying to prove to someone that what you're doing is "rational" and "mathematically correct" is a bloody waste of everyone's time.

This post was edited by olba on Jul 22 2010 04:14pm

is it a false theory?

as I recall it was a rational explanation demonstrated with mathematical models

If it is so false then please present your rational explanation in the same fashion.

Simply using hand down information such as "jalal's blows rox keke," which is apparently derived from a source that had been wrong in the first place, and then transmitted by word of mouth, is not a rational explanation. I know you think it is. I can assure you that it is not.

K waiting.



Where in there did I ask for your opinion.

I asked you to demonstrated irrefutable that I am wrong using mathematical models in the same fashion.

Are you suggesting we turn this into an argument of how to use english? I suggest for the benefit of the JSP perception of you, that we do not. This is in favor of you. I will make you look like a complete and total ass.

Those are mathematical models based on the definitions of mathematical and models shall we intemperate? Ok thanks.

Main Entry: math·e·mat·i·cal
Pronunciation: \ˌmath-ˈma-ti-kəl, ˌma-thə-\
Variant(s): also math·e·mat·ic \-tik\
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English mathematicalle, from Latin mathematicus, from Greek mathēmatikos, from mathēmat-, mathēma learning, mathematics, from manthanein to learn; probably akin to Gothic mundon to pay attention
Date: 15th century

1 : of, relating to, or according with mathematics
2 a : rigorously exact : precise b : certain
3 : possible but highly improbable <only a mathematical chance>

— math·e·mat·i·cal·ly \-ti-k(ə-)lē\ adverb

Reference:

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mathematical

Ok so most people would agree that my usage of "mathematical" is appropriate.

Main Entry: 1mod·el
Pronunciation: \ˈmä-dəl\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle French modelle, from Old Italian modello, from Vulgar Latin *modellus, from Latin modulus small measure, from modus
Date: 1575

1 obsolete : a set of plans for a building
2 dialect British : copy, image
3 : structural design <a home on the model of an old farmhouse>
4 : a usually miniature representation of something; also : a pattern of something to be made
5 : an example for imitation or emulation
6 : a person or thing that serves as a pattern for an artist; especially : one who poses for an artist
7 : archetype
8 : an organism whose appearance a mimic imitates
9 : one who is employed to display clothes or other merchandise
10 a : a type or design of clothing b : a type or design of product (as a car)
11 : a description or analogy used to help visualize something (as an atom) that cannot be directly observed
12 : a system of postulates, data, and inferences presented as a mathematical description of an entity or state of affairs; also : a computer simulation based on such a system <climate models>
13 : version 3
14 : animal model
synonyms model, example, pattern, exemplar, ideal mean someone or something set before one for guidance or imitation. model applies to something taken or proposed as worthy of imitation <a decor that is a model of good taste>. example applies to a person to be imitated or in some contexts on no account to be imitated but to be regarded as a warning <children tend to follow the example of their parents>. pattern suggests a clear and detailed archetype or prototype <American industry set a pattern for others to follow>. exemplar suggests either a faultless example to be emulated or a perfect typification <cited Joan of Arc as the exemplar of courage>. ideal implies the best possible exemplification either in reality or in conception <never found a job that matched his ideal>.

Reference:

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/model

It looks like my usage of model is correct also.



YOU GOT ANYTHING ELSE EINSTEIN?


K so still waiting for your irrefutable proof supporting your position

Dude, stop arguing semantics, that's a waste of everyone's time. If you want to be taken seriously, you need to ditch the righteous hero attitude and get yourself together.

Oh and yeah, arguing semantics makes you look like a troll.

This post was edited by olba on Jul 22 2010 04:16pm