check the first page,i think it was ww

Nobody said that, the first reply by Worrywart is what started it and if you go back and read it you will clearly understand he is correct, if you are intelligent enough. If you don't then you've failed to understand what 'effectively' means. I'll help you, when he says effectively he is talking about the comparative value increase before and after negation from resistance has been factored.

Just to stoke the fires even more, if a target has 90% physical resistance, and you curse them with Amplify Damage, you have effectively increased your damage output against that target over ten fold

^ That should keep it running for about 10 more pages, I won't even risk blowing your mind by discussing Amp against a 100% resistance monster...



This post was edited by Marieusz on Nov 11 2017 08:42am

Having the same discussion after 6 months in the same thread with someone that must be clearly trolling at this point is dumb.

Almost as dumb as keep bumping this and on top of that become mad when a new Arhimond arrive.

yeah that must be it, there is a post somewhere that proves all of us wrong, but you're not gonna quote it, oh no.
Also good job on not answering the simple question in post#277. It's a trap: would you try to answer it, your feeble mind would catch a glimpse of the extent of your stupidity and whatever lies where your brain should be would explode

in the battle of wits, all y'all show up unarmed, while I have my shako

You mean your dumce cap?

Well tbh, if you're not a native English speaker, I imagine it's easy to misunderstand or simply not see the difference between

You effectively take triple damage

vs.

You take triple damage

These two statements mean vastly different things.

That being said, it's the internet and my vote is for epic trolling.

Not trolling even a little bit. He's stupid or as you said, not native.

If target has 100% dr and you amp them they effectively take infinitely more damage

shut up pikachu faggot, u need to graduate from gr 3 math