d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo II > Diablo 2 Discussion > Strategy & Guides >
Poll > 2 Ravens Gm Because Of Build?! Bull
Prev12324252627114Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Banned
Posts: 1,295
Joined: Jan 13 2009
Gold: 4.96
Warn: 10%
Apr 27 2009 12:15pm
37 32020 would suck but 37 205 would suck even more LOL
Member
Posts: 772
Joined: Jul 11 2007
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Apr 27 2009 12:15pm
Quote (sylvannos @ Mon, Apr 27 2009, 06:10pm)
There is some useful shit listed in those guides.

If anything, check them out to see what other people are doing so you can know what to expect.

The fact is that you win *most,* not all of your duels.

You cannot nor will you ever win all of them, no one is at that point.

But you can learn and refine your build and characters.

I've remade my sin twice (this is the 3rd version of her), my summoner once (prolly the only char I've ever made and been more than 95% happy with), my paladin god-knows-how-many times, numerous druids of all variants, etc. etc.

I think the only build I haven't used is a pally using vengeance.

There is nothing wrong with remaking chars...it's part of the game.

Basically, you are a stubborn, close-minded kid who doesn't know how to take a loss (which imo is one of the biggest signs of immaturity when you can't learn from a loss), who doesn't take reliable criticism, and refuses the advice of others (yes, I know we're harsh, but deal with it because the shit we say is helpful).

On top of that, you steal fucking pixels from kids on a video game.

You eat babies, too?


This would've been a good post in my book if it didn't contain the immature, ignorant insults at the end. I knew as I neared the bottom of the post that I was about to read an insult. You're too predictable.

Reliable criticism is not flaming and making personal insults. If you think it is, then you need to re-evaluate criticism as a whole. Reliable criticism is pointing out the problem, and subsequently giving advice to correct it. Your example of being "Harsh" is just Immature Criticism.

Now that i've addressed that properly, yes, I do agree with the beginning of your post.

This post was edited by Advariel on Apr 27 2009 12:19pm
Member
Posts: 28,769
Joined: Apr 22 2008
Gold: 351.01
Apr 27 2009 12:15pm
Quote (darkkobra @ Mon, Apr 27 2009, 02:14pm)
if they dont die in 1 blizz --> WFTBBQHAX/shitty bm absorber

^_^


yes and dont forget his only weekness are bowazon ^^
Member
Posts: 30,379
Joined: Apr 4 2006
Gold: 5,450.00
Apr 27 2009 12:16pm
Quote (Aube @ Mon, 27 Apr 2009, 20:09)
ladder is infested by mf dueler...they think they are good because noone has res gear until they duel a halfdecent  barb with 2 raven. Then they make a thread in SnG forum to show how ingnorant they are and they get verballed. There is hacked items,mods, and shitty dueling community in ladder. I take it as a dodge because you can't face the truth and admit that your knowlegde is very limited when it come to PvP.

thank you


slam ^^
Member
Posts: 772
Joined: Jul 11 2007
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Apr 27 2009 12:16pm
Quote (dark-soul @ Mon, Apr 27 2009, 06:13pm)
Lolwut?


As I said to another poster, correct me if i'm wrong. 25 + 55 = 80, no? I fail to see the problem with that post.
Member
Posts: 28,769
Joined: Apr 22 2008
Gold: 351.01
Apr 27 2009 12:17pm
Quote (Dawn Of Victory @ Mon, Apr 27 2009, 02:16pm)
slam ^^


wasnt even using 2 raven <.<
Banned
Posts: 8,039
Joined: Jun 24 2004
Gold: 33.01
Warn: 50%
Apr 27 2009 12:17pm
well heres the thing. 37x 3/20/20's vs 20/5's comes out to be:
111 max damage
740 attack rating

vs
185% resistances

except heres the thing. With a 450 damage grief, +111 max damage is only about +13% overall damage. You're increasing your total damage by about 13%, because thats only +111 max, which is only +56 average, compared to your 450 base weapon damage. Sure, the AR is good, but what do you need AR for besides paladins & barbarians, duels where you'll obviously have to use angelics set? Meanwhile, 185% resistance is the difference between a blizz sorc killing you in 3 hits and killing you in 24 hits. Because resistances work multiplicatively; you take twice as much damage with only 25% less resistances some times, remember (75% vs 50%)

I'd go with the 20/5's. 3/20/20's have an extremely marginal effect on your damage output, and are highly overrated. Sure, its great for bvb duels, but this is a bvc
Member
Posts: 42,832
Joined: Jun 26 2005
Gold: 7.18
Warn: 100%
Apr 27 2009 12:17pm
Quote (Advariel @ Mon, 27 Apr 2009, 20:12)
You're missing the point as well.  The point, in bold:

Barbs should NOT be able to use dual Ravens and call it GM, when the same act by any other class would be considered BM.

It's not about ignorance or playing skill.  It's about the ridicule of this rule and how it needs to be changed.

Quote (Advariel @ Mon, 27 Apr 2009, 20:16)
As I said to another poster, correct me if i'm wrong.  25 + 55 = 80, no?  I fail to see the problem with that post.






This post was edited by darkkobra on Apr 27 2009 12:18pm
Member
Posts: 772
Joined: Jul 11 2007
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Apr 27 2009 12:18pm
Quote (darkkobra @ Mon, Apr 27 2009, 06:17pm)
http://www.grim-planet.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/jesus_facepalm.jpg


You still didn't give me 1 good reason why the rule shouldn't be changed.
Member
Posts: 28,769
Joined: Apr 22 2008
Gold: 351.01
Apr 27 2009 12:19pm
Quote (Advariel @ Mon, Apr 27 2009, 02:18pm)
You still didn't give me 1 good reason why the rule shouldn't be changed.


You still didnt give us 1 good reason why the rule should be changed.
Go Back To Strategy & Guides Topic List
Prev12324252627114Next
Closed New Topic New Poll