Quote (AbysmalDescent @ Thu, Jul 17 2008, 10:01am)
you seriously fail at everything including this game blind dork. mathematically it ought to be whatever the formula you're using gives you but you just pull numbers out of your enlarged ass, and PLEASE tell me how you got the 5%-from-in-game-test HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH.
you don't know shit about ww and tried to redeem yourself by blabbering about arreat summit. eat a dick.
everyone who can't see the very significant difference between 75 and 105 frw should visit a fucking optician lol
5% was using a stopwatch over the same path several times, with 105 and 75 frw. the results were quite consistant, around 5%. by the calcs (as i guess you've figured out...) it's around 7% or something, but in-game > calcs. feel free to test it on your own though.
btw, i didn't say i CAN'T tell a difference. I said i can BARELY tell a difference. if you're seriously saying 5% faster runspeed is totally obvious, you're either a machinist or lying out your ass.
Quote (APPOLE @ Thu, Jul 17 2008, 10:41am)
...
huk huk
i guess you've never played a necromancer then
or a trapper
or a druid
or.....
take a second to stop theorycrafting and actually apply things empirically...
ow8, cant
yeah i've never played a trapper, that's why i wrote a 30-page-guide with s/s's about them

i tested it out in-game, first with just my eyesight and then with an actual stopwatch. i'm not sure how it's possible to GET any more empirical.
EDIT: btw, it's even LESS important with BoS, which i use for about 1/2 my duels anyway...
This post was edited by darcanegel on Jul 17 2008 01:37pm