d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo II > Diablo 2 Discussion > Strategy & Guides > Obsession Builds > D2:R
Prev1234512Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 3,563
Joined: Aug 11 2008
Gold: 6,750.00
Jun 13 2022 10:16am
Quote (Bui6Pays40Percent4Wins @ Jun 12 2022 11:31pm)
Obsession is worse than other Easy to obtain options for literally every sorc.

Obsession is trash


Noted, thanks for your input.
Member
Posts: 69,459
Joined: Aug 3 2013
Gold: 31,189.69
Jun 13 2022 10:24am
Quote (AvanineCommuter @ Jun 13 2022 11:15am)
I mainly play SvS so I don't care about DR. Now shoo.



Svs you should be 200fcr vita fber

Of which the only way to reach 200fvr with obsessions is if you use griffons.

Which means you are giving up 1 sorc skill, 1 additional socket, and 2 additional suffixes and 1 additional prefix so you can use this staff.

Trrrrrrrrrble trade off.


If you mainly play svs, this should be extremely obvious to you.
Member
Posts: 9,240
Joined: Sep 21 2006
Gold: 2,770.00
Jun 13 2022 10:53am
Quote (AvanineCommuter @ Jun 13 2022 04:53am)
You don’t need DR against elemental damage which is the main concern - You shouldn’t be getting hit that often by melee hits as a sorc. You don’t need cnbf as it doesn’t impact cast speed. You don’t need absorb when you have max res and can even get 85-90 res with a simple gear swap. You can also add DR to the build and still hit 4.7k life.

How is ES better when you can barely reach 18k fb dmg?

28k damage is nothing if you’re dead.


Its better because with an es sorc u can win every matchup. A vita fb sorc only wins against other sorcs. Thats all. This build gonna get rekt by druids hammers necs..... it has not a single good matchup
Member
Posts: 3,563
Joined: Aug 11 2008
Gold: 6,750.00
Jun 13 2022 01:18pm
Quote (Bui6Pays40Percent4Wins @ Jun 13 2022 12:24pm)
Svs you should be 200fcr vita fber

Of which the only way to reach 200fvr with obsessions is if you use griffons.

Which means you are giving up 1 sorc skill, 1 additional socket, and 2 additional suffixes and 1 additional prefix so you can use this staff.

Trrrrrrrrrble trade off.


If you mainly play svs, this should be extremely obvious to you.



Yes, the whole point of the OP is discussing if 105 vita baller would be viable given the huge life boost. I only played 200 fber and it was not a very flexible build, and requires a lot of gear swaps with expensive circlets to be competitive and max out life - which iirc most vita svs were around 3.5k-4k life.

Considering the top of svs ladder was a 105 fcr ESFB (skill > build) who couldn’t tank more than the vita 200fcr svs, then a 5.2k life vitaballer wouldn’t be out of the question.
Member
Posts: 3,563
Joined: Aug 11 2008
Gold: 6,750.00
Jun 13 2022 01:20pm
Quote (paweljonk @ Jun 13 2022 12:53pm)
Its better because with an es sorc u can win every matchup. A vita fb sorc only wins against other sorcs. Thats all. This build gonna get rekt by druids hammers necs..... it has not a single good matchup



Winning against other sorcs is kinda the point of SvS.
Member
Posts: 9,240
Joined: Sep 21 2006
Gold: 2,770.00
Jun 13 2022 01:23pm
Quote (AvanineCommuter @ Jun 13 2022 09:20pm)
Winning against other sorcs is kinda the point of SvS.


u go 200fcr on vita sorc not 105 for svs. thats why i dont see a way to make obession work
Member
Posts: 3,563
Joined: Aug 11 2008
Gold: 6,750.00
Jun 13 2022 01:26pm
Quote (paweljonk @ Jun 13 2022 12:53pm)
Its better because with an es sorc u can win every matchup. A vita fb sorc only wins against other sorcs. Thats all. This build gonna get rekt by druids hammers necs..... it has not a single good matchup



ES is great all around, but ES sorcs get destroyed by sins worse than vita (OW/PSN/Traps).

And most ES sorcs do suffer in SvS.

Vita sorcs are never really viable in PVP but that was when they sat at 3.5k life. 5.2k life is a much bigger tank than what was previously possible - and remember with dungos / enigma / Ber runes you can still get DR and run a respectable 4.6k life sorc.
Member
Posts: 6,001
Joined: Dec 9 2017
Gold: 3.00
Jun 13 2022 01:37pm
I want to try an Obsession based Cold Sorc that emphasizes life and pierce vs cold damage.

Run a Faceted Jewelers Armor, 3 Blizz/3 CM Obsession, NW, Arach, Aldurs, Bloodfist, 2 FCR/Life/Res/Mana rings, Maras or high life crafted 2 sorc amulet.

Fathom has more damage, but the Jewelers Armor still provides some life, a balance in CD, and more pierce. And the obvious center of attention on the build would be towards maximum life, since all your charms, rings, jewelers, aldur, bloodfist, and hard vita points (which is even more since you'll have 0 to str) will be boosted by up to 25%.

This post was edited by eric1014153 on Jun 13 2022 01:37pm
Member
Posts: 3,563
Joined: Aug 11 2008
Gold: 6,750.00
Jun 13 2022 01:38pm
Quote (eric1014153 @ Jun 13 2022 03:37pm)
I want to try an Obsession based Cold Sorc that emphasizes life and pierce vs cold damage.

Run a Faceted Jewelers Armor, 3 Blizz/3 CM Obsession, NW, Arach, Aldurs, Bloodfist, 2 FCR/Life/Res/Mana rings, Maras or high life crafted 2 sorc amulet.

Fathom has more damage, but the Jewelers Armor still provides some life, a balance in CD, and more pierce. And the obvious center of attention on the build would be towards maximum life, since all your charms, rings, jewelers, aldur, bloodfist, and hard vita points (which is even more since you'll have 0 to str) will be boosted by up to 25%.



Would love to see the numbers on this and just how much of a damage loss blizz with take without fathom. I imagine it would be quite substantial?
Member
Posts: 69,459
Joined: Aug 3 2013
Gold: 31,189.69
Jun 13 2022 01:40pm
Quote (AvanineCommuter @ Jun 13 2022 02:38pm)
Would love to see the numbers on this and just how much of a damage loss blizz with take without fathom. I imagine it would be quite substantial?



Very substantional
Go Back To Strategy & Guides Topic List
Prev1234512Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll