usually say 1 sorb or + to max res item is fine. or anything goes in public duels.

but if ppl wish to use more thats up to them, u cant expect a bvc to take off his rings, just because a cold sorc enters the game.

so does that mean if im using a pally im bm because i use 45res sheild and 20/5's, givin stacked res? u can't ask ppl to chop and change there gear just because it doesn't suite you

This post was edited by Tiidus on Apr 26 2009 04:09pm

I can cope with it just fine. I just don't like it when people hide behind their raven frosts, thawing potions and 4 sapphire monarchs and talk shit.



Thanks for the informative, well thought out post. You're ignorant if you can't see i'm making a valid point, you're probably one of those dipshit BM barbs that does exactly what I said in my post.

Fuck you, get the fuck off my thread, and go jack off to more +1 posts you dipshit.

I don't care how many fucking posts you have.



This.



I'm no expert on barbs, but you'd think a BVC shouldn't be using dual ravens anyway.

This post was edited by Advariel on Apr 26 2009 04:54pm

wrong. 2x raven frosts is the best setup for a bvc. fcr rings come in handy for some duels, but ravens are #1 choice in general

why?

mana.

mass dex, mass ar. no rare ring compares, unless for some duels u need the extra fcr

That's why, I would've assumed.

Still, even though raven's are the best choice, it doesn't automatically make it GM because a certain build requires BM sorb. Like I said before, if my "build" required 2 wisps others would have the same opinion and tell me i'm full of shit, just like they are.

im asking why they shoudnt be using raven..

this is why i have nothing against sorb. ppl can use whatever they like.

how can u class barbs as being gm with 2 ravens (which it is as its there general setup) and not for a diff char

Exactly.

I think Blizz made a big mistake by limiting DR to 55% (Or whatever percentage it is.) (Edit: In PVP anyway. In PvM, 100% DR would be way overpowered)

If characters should be able to become invulnerable to elemental damage, the same should apply to physical and magic (hammers) damage.

This post was edited by Advariel on Apr 26 2009 05:02pm

I think the way things are are fine. sure sorb limits ele chars alot. but then es limits hdins and necros alot. it works both ways.

diff classes are always going to have an advtange over a diff class.