non tap i guess?

correct

not bad if non tap, low ds though. i'm guessing ur using eth fools but no rep

This post was edited by Neko on Apr 7 2012 03:31pm

Or eth rep fools and 1 socket.

Correct. 1x Lo + 15% DS from Gore = 35%

and not using highlords lol.

ahh..ic, i always used hls with e fools lol.

Yep, I'd agree, iirc angelics only adds like 6-6.5k AR over 2 ravens.

So if you take away angelics he'd have 24.25k AR, so with these assumptions its like 43.5% chance to hit with angelics and 37.7% chance to hit without angelics ( assuming 40k def ).

If you only have 35% DS aside from highlords, highlords is superior in this case imo.

This post was edited by Jeebus666 on Apr 7 2012 04:56pm

Regarding that. Should I use Fort SA or Prudence SA.

I will lose these stats:

Damage: 2077-8637
AR: 30755
Def: 34548
Life: 3782

and w/ Prudence

Damage: 1650-6850
AR: same
Def: 50,500
Life: around the same, less fhr charms

I'd say prudence is better in non tap, do some example calcs ( or in game tests ) with those damage rolls tho, find out the probability of killing an opponent with like 3.5-4k life in 3 hits, 4 hits , 5 hits etc..you should be able to see whether the higher damage is helping you or not.

imo gelics arent' that good for non tap but it's good with tap though but it's also good with edc and erazor xD

u dont need fhr charms though since zeal is interupt lol