d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo II > Diablo 2 Discussion > Strategy & Guides > Treachery Vs Fortitude - The Complete Calculation > Diablo 2 Rocket Science
Prev1111213141542Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Views: 93381Replies: 411Track Topic
Member
Posts: 50,002
Joined: Apr 22 2008
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
#121
Apr 30 2011 11:12am
Quote (bioshocker @ Apr 30 2011 08:10pm)

Stick to pvm. Huehhahahaha. My merc simply crushes ubers with fortitude. Then ofc i got a summon nec+concentration buffer, but idc. Fortitude>all. In pvp/ubers.Besides barbs/chargers/ww sins cant touch dis merc. 60k defence, 80 light res great vs traps n tstorm n shit. Lmk treachery tools


trashing you requires no commenting, only bolding.
Member
Posts: 23,143
Joined: Jan 31 2007
Gold: 5.50
Warn: 10%
#122
Apr 30 2011 11:22am
Quote (Synonym @ Apr 30 2011 05:07pm)
you failed, deal with it.
read prior remarks and original thread math.


dodge..
Member
Posts: 6,647
Joined: Nov 3 2009
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
#123
Apr 30 2011 11:32am
Quote (bioshocker @ Apr 27 2011 12:35pm)
I read it, done tests in-game more then you or this whole sng can imagine retard;its alright vs monsters,in pvp-completely useless;its nice for merc to fade altrought, THEN swap fortitude and kill that annoying fb sorc


You can't kill a fire sorc with a massively buffed BvC?

LOL
Member
Posts: 12,710
Joined: Jan 7 2008
Gold: 0.00
#124
Apr 30 2011 12:21pm
Quote (Synonym @ 30 Apr 2011 13:07)
you failed, deal with it.
read prior remarks and original thread math.


why would you use a GT for a max damage comparison... Fort + Might on a thresher = more damage and same speed ^^
Member
Posts: 13,691
Joined: Oct 6 2009
Gold: 1,000.00
#125
Apr 30 2011 01:12pm
Quote (Jaxz @ Apr 30 2011 04:40am)
Your just simply bias towards treachery with weak evidence from the o/p, just following blindly other people calculations without your own. Look, the o/p post has many mistakes. Your just a following blindly, very invalid.


I have done my own tests several years ago in 2006 to compare Fort and Treachery and it was clearly obvious Treachery was better. So just GTFO. Even if has mistakes, clearly OP has made a case, regardless of how accurate it is, rather than everyone else claiming "FORT > TREACHERY NOOBS"
Member
Posts: 2,400
Joined: Mar 29 2011
Gold: 19,395.00
#126
Apr 30 2011 01:44pm
treach > fort PVM
fort > treach BOTTING

there u go
Member
Posts: 50,002
Joined: Apr 22 2008
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
#127
Apr 30 2011 02:13pm
Quote (Trapslick @ Apr 30 2011 09:21pm)
why would you use a GT for a max damage comparison... Fort + Might on a thresher = more damage and same speed ^^


thresher has 0.5 less avg dmg.

Quote (Godest @ Apr 30 2011 10:12pm)
I have done my own tests several years ago in 2006 to compare Fort and Treachery and it was clearly obvious Treachery was better.  So just GTFO.  Even if has mistakes, clearly OP has made a case, regardless of how accurate it is, rather than everyone else claiming "FORT > TREACHERY NOOBS"


the only mistake i made was forgetting to add fractions caused by x players in game to cb multipliers. the addition in fractions is so minuscule it will add maybe 1-2 extra strikes to *both* setups, so nothing is changed. but yea, i never expected anything to change by making this topic.

This post was edited by Synonym on Apr 30 2011 02:14pm
Member
Posts: 23,143
Joined: Jan 31 2007
Gold: 5.50
Warn: 10%
#128
Apr 30 2011 02:15pm
Quote (Godest @ Apr 30 2011 07:12pm)
I have done my own tests several years ago in 2006 to compare Fort and Treachery and it was clearly obvious Treachery was better.  So just GTFO.  Even if has mistakes, clearly OP has made a case, regardless of how accurate it is, rather than everyone else claiming "FORT > TREACHERY NOOBS"


nice raging.. angry kido.. :thumbsup:
Member
Posts: 37,894
Joined: Jul 15 2006
Gold: 24,309.00
#129
Apr 30 2011 02:16pm
who seriously read that shit ? (exept tudey)
Member
Posts: 13,691
Joined: Oct 6 2009
Gold: 1,000.00
#130
Apr 30 2011 02:23pm
This post is a violation of the site rules and appropriate action was taken.

Quote (MULTIQ @ Apr 30 2011 01:15pm)
nice raging.. angry kido.. :thumbsup:


nice stupidity...stupid bro.. :thumbsup:

damn your mother should of taught you both English and manners before she passed.

Quote (CheesePwns @ Apr 30 2011 12:44pm)
treach > fort PVM
fort > treach BOTTING

there u go


What? Because botters aren't PvMing? Treachery > everything always.

This post was edited by Godest on Apr 30 2011 02:23pm
Go Back To Strategy & Guides Topic List
Prev1111213141542Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact