Quote (Jeebus666 @ Jul 13 2011 02:34pm)
mages arent that great in my experience, they work ok in pubs if your opponent doesn't have stack, but if he does then you're left with what essentially is a worse varient of a hammerdin ( a hdin should have just 1 pt foh for stun ).
barb > smite yea i guess i agree with, but vs a v/t a barb can also stack against foh too making the duel essentially barb vs smite which as you've said yourself barb got the advantage
well... a hdin thast good enough will beat a vt... agreed?
a good mage will beat a hdin is 1v1 due to the hdin being forced to stack and 1 source of damge vs 2. 13k hammers vs 10k hammer + 5.5kfoh is no contest really... on a hdin. it will take the same amount of hits to kill (3). with foh, the hdin is forced to be offensive and can make more errors
vs a smiter, the barb can just pace himself, however in barb vs vt. the barb is forced to stack and loses out on a lot of importnat things. then add in the fact that a vt can play defensive and force the barb to do the chasing. with the barb messes up, the vt has a huge adv (not to mention life tap). if the vt messes up, he gets hit like once or so... its not that big of a deal.
however if u get telesmited or charged. that deals a huge chunk of damage and playing offensive = more change of error
This post was edited by Azn Masta on Jul 13 2011 12:39pm