Quote (L8knightResurrected @ Aug 10 2022 02:02am)
we agree that range is the reason ba grief is better pvp. so grief ba wins for pvp. beast /grief ba is as fast or almost as fast as grief pbs because fan counts for ww now. so speed isn't a reason to pick grief pbs over grief/beast. i would argue that the damage from and extra grief isn't going to be noticeably better than the extra damage from fan and the 20% cb from beast. so damage for 2 handed skill is a tie. for 1 handed skills like berserk grief/beast is going to be way better because of fan. unless the flat damage from the offhand grief applies to the striking hand grief i stand by my original statement. the only reason to use grief pbs is so you don't have to repair.
beast bva was used because of old ww mechanics and free ww hit frame.. since prior to this patch the free hit frames would only use your mainhand weapon, beast was used to buff the mainhand damage to compensate.
2 griefs are better pve.
and no a ba is [0] wsm and a pb is [-30] .. its a massive difference. the numbers just dont lie mate i get it you have a sweet spot for axes and barbs look dumb with crystal swords but it is what it is now...
e/ havent looked at what the consensus is for pvp but two grief ba's might pull ahead of the beast.. only reason you might beast now is to buff your zerk fpa ^^
ee/ this is just wrong cause grief pb is certainly better then ba on a zerk barb too..
tldr theres now better excuse for the pbs then simply repair costs.
This post was edited by Hepzibah on Aug 10 2022 12:28am