your

I'll vouch for him. i just traded him 5k fg last night. and i have an extensive trading history too.

also, i've been here WAY before any of you have.

This post was edited by kookiekrak on Jun 30 2011 07:52am

Thanks for the vouches everyone!
Also me and dark did clear things up last night. Hopefully we will both come out on top!

you're

your


it would be you`re in "you`re vouching for that guy" kind of phrase
what`s wrong with you illiterate people ? Instead staying in your cave , you have the guts to argue on grammar matters ... and i`m not even a native english speaker

I would have said you're too because you're = you are.

So in essence he is saying - you are vouching.

That is the proper way to say it (willing to bet some money on it although English isn't my best subject)

your is to show possession im pretty sure. so as in, your vouches. Being that you own them

Again i could be wrong but im pretty sure thats right.

Anyway im going to have to remake a thread cause this one is all spammed up with grammer
Feel free to post in this one, but lets keep the repost to a minimum of spam

i was quoting this phrase :



so you can`t say "you are vouching is not needed" , it`s "your vouching is not needed"

herp derp

oh yea your right, i didnt bother to look at the original post, i only saw " you're vouching ... "

broski i flout the rules more than 90% of jsp people just seem to like me just because you flout the rules does not mean you are a scammer.