d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Other Games > MMORPG > Eve Online > Alliances?
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Retired Moderator
Posts: 10,292
Joined: Jun 5 2003
Gold: 35.00
Trader: Trusted
Apr 12 2008 12:20pm
So since everyone on this forum is buying ISK and no one is selling, we should probably find an alternate use for our space.

What alliances are people in now? What alliances have you been in? Do you focus on PVP or PVE?

Personally, I have been in ASCN, FIX, and Tri. with raeky. We have spent time focusing on PVP and PVE, though raeky feels a magenetic attraction to asteroids. I personally focus on capital PVP, which means that I never was able to have fun very often. Currently training Gallente Dread V (I have carrier and fighter V already).
Member
Posts: 695
Joined: Nov 12 2007
Gold: 745.55
Apr 12 2008 06:03pm
I currently run a corp that is in the alliance Kingdom Of Redemption. We're working on getting some 0.0 space and are promised around 8 outposts. Already have one, working on the rest. My past alliances include EveSpace Alliance, and Cold Star Alliance.
Member
Posts: 1,250
Joined: Mar 16 2008
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 10%
Apr 12 2008 11:09pm
I'm in the Sex Panters alliance. Currently and daily owning every single person that decides that today was the day to go through Rancer.

If you already lost a ship in Rancer, there's a good chance that I'm partly responsible for it.
Retired Moderator
Posts: 3,620
Joined: Oct 22 2002
Gold: 99.00
Trader: Trusted
Apr 13 2008 05:48pm
FLA was my first alliance... then ASCN then FIX then Tri and now ism sorta in limbo possibly helping create another alliance if cards fall into place right.. *sigh*

Mining is my primary source of income. My main character isn't that bad of a pvp pilot and currently is battling her way back from -10 security status from a fair bit of shooting good ol' macro haulers.. HAHA
Member
Posts: 1,250
Joined: Mar 16 2008
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 10%
Apr 14 2008 06:56am
Tri is the most retarded alliance.

They were fun at start, but now they're becoming the new BOB, always more power hungry, and completely ridiculous.

The other day we attacked a POS, with 2 dreads and 2 carriers. it was a small POS, owned by a completely random person.

That guy went to cry like a baby to probably a friend in Tri.

Result is that Tri dropped 8 Motherships and 25 Carriers on us, to kill 2 Dreads and 2 Carriers (and a Cyno alt in a cruiser...)

When you fight like that, you're just simply retarded.
Retired Moderator
Posts: 10,292
Joined: Jun 5 2003
Gold: 35.00
Trader: Trusted
Apr 14 2008 07:10am
Quote (Kevin_fr @ Mon, Apr 14 2008, 07:56am)
Tri is the most retarded alliance.

They were fun at start, but now they're becoming the new BOB, always more power hungry, and completely ridiculous.

The other day we attacked a POS, with 2 dreads and 2 carriers. it was a small POS, owned by a completely random person.

That guy went to cry like a baby to probably a friend in Tri.

Result is that Tri dropped 8 Motherships and 25 Carriers on us, to kill 2 Dreads and 2 Carriers (and a Cyno alt in a cruiser...)

When you fight like that, you're just simply retarded.


So Tri killed four of your capital ships for fun, ergo they are retarded. Excellent argument wink.gif
Member
Posts: 1,250
Joined: Mar 16 2008
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 10%
Apr 14 2008 09:38am
Quote (darkfire @ Mon, 14 Apr 2008, 14:10)
So Tri killed four of your capital ships for fun, ergo they are retarded. Excellent argument wink.gif


no, they're power hungry, and don't fight fair.

Who the hell drops 8 mums and 25 carriers on a 4 cap fleet, to defend a random small POS, in a system where they don't even have any interests ?

They also know that on same grounds, we would freaking destroy their fleet.

Let them come to us in normal ships, and at 10 BS vs 20 BS, we would still anihilate them.

They don't really know how to pvp, all they have is T2 BPO's, and lots of isk.

This post was edited by Kevin_fr on Apr 14 2008 09:45am
Retired Moderator
Posts: 3,620
Joined: Oct 22 2002
Gold: 99.00
Trader: Trusted
Apr 14 2008 10:48am
Noone fights fair, thats whats retarded.

Superior firepower always smart.

And power hungry means region domination and subjugation. Like bob attempted to do.

Tri is content with one region and a couple "pets" in the surrounding regions for control/buffer zone. I highly doubt you'll see Tri taking over more space then they have members to effectively control. BoB's mechnisim was to take space and rent it without the power to control and protect it. And as you see those regions fell immediately without a fight. Theres very large differences between Tri and BoB.

Retired Moderator
Posts: 10,292
Joined: Jun 5 2003
Gold: 35.00
Trader: Trusted
Apr 14 2008 11:01am
Quote (Kevin_fr @ Mon, Apr 14 2008, 10:38am)
no, they're power hungry, and don't fight fair.

Who the hell drops 8 mums and 25 carriers on a 4 cap fleet, to defend a random small POS, in a system where they don't even have any interests ?

They also know that on same grounds, we would freaking destroy their fleet.

Let them come to us in normal ships, and at 10 BS vs 20 BS, we would still anihilate them.

They don't really know how to pvp, all they have is T2 BPO's, and lots of isk.


Because Sex Panthers has never once engaged anyone anywhere in an "unfair fight". Look at your own alliance's killboard stats ffs. You guys do it too.

If you're interested, they had every reason to kill your cap ships: they were poorly defended and overexposed in lowsec. I sincerely doubt they were "defending a random small POS". Either someone knew the owner or, more likely, someone in the Tri Capital channel noticed that people in your alliance were begging to be killed by attacking a tower without sufficient backup. Tri--like most alliances, including your own--is filled with killmail whores and you guys gave them four juicy targets. The "we're better adjusted for inflation" argument only goes so far. Stop trying to make them play by your rules and start "freaking destroy[ing] their fleet[s]" or stop whinging.

I don't like 0.0 warfare and I'm not a huge fan of my former alliance (actually I loathe most of alliance leadership), but this whiney self-righteous moral pontification irritates me a lot more than a bunch of guys who like killmails and don't particularly care how they get them.
Member
Posts: 1,250
Joined: Mar 16 2008
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 10%
Apr 14 2008 04:06pm
Quote (darkfire @ Mon, 14 Apr 2008, 18:01)
Because Sex Panthers has never once engaged anyone anywhere in an "unfair fight". Look at your own alliance's killboard stats ffs. You guys do it too.

If you're interested, they had every reason to kill your cap ships: they were poorly defended and overexposed in lowsec. I sincerely doubt they were "defending a random small POS". Either someone knew the owner or, more likely, someone in the Tri Capital channel noticed that people in your alliance were begging to be killed by attacking a tower without sufficient backup. Tri--like most alliances, including your own--is filled with killmail whores and you guys gave them four juicy targets. The "we're better adjusted for inflation" argument only goes so far. Stop trying to make them play by your rules and start "freaking destroy[ing] their fleet[s]" or stop whinging.

I don't like 0.0 warfare and I'm not a huge fan of my former alliance (actually I loathe most of alliance leadership), but this whiney self-righteous moral pontification irritates me a lot more than a bunch of guys who like killmails and don't particularly care how they get them.


i'd love to meet you ingame and hunt you down.

you seem like a easy carebear target. you disgust me.
Go Back To Eve Online Topic List
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll