Quote (graphixs @ Sun, 8 Jun 2008, 21:34)
no way Blader deals more dmg they hit faster and are quicker but deals less dmg then a WA per skill
No, they don't.
Lets compare skills shall we?
WA comp attack lvl 1, lvl 1 char:
Amp: 1.70
Add attack: 802.50(+ 2.50 per level)
This attack hits only once, and has a cast time of 3 sec.
WA gm attack lvl 1, lvl 1 char:
Amp: 1.70
Add attack: 806.00(+ 6.00 per level)
This attack hits multiple times, and has a cast time of 4.3 sec.
WA am attack lvl 1, lvl 1 char:
Amp: 1.60
Add attack: 873.40(+2.70 per level)
This attack hits only once, and has a cast time of 6.5 sec.
Rest of the WA attacks deal low dmg/low amp, so i cba writing those.
Now lets move on to a blader:
BL comp attack lvl 1, lvl 1 char:
Amp 1.70
Add attack: 755.50(+5.50 per level)
Crit rate: 10%
Crit dmg: 10%
This attack has a cast time of 3 seconds, and hits 6 times.
BL gm attack lvl 1, lvl 1 char:
Amp 1.70
Add attack: 755.50(+5.50 per level)
Crit rate: 10%
Crit dmg: 10%
This attack has a cast time of 4.7 seconds, and hits 7 times.
BL am attack lvl 1, lvl 1 char:
Amp: 1.60
Add attack: 521.20(+1.50 per level)
Crit rate: 5%
Crit dmg: 20%
As you can see, WA skills have slightly, and I mean, slightly more dmg than BL skills.
But bladers have a natural boost to crit dmg/rate, which adds up the dmg bladers lack.
Furthermore, if you compare dmg/cast time, also referred to as damage per second, or just dps, bladers are far more superior than a warrior.
What good is a skill hitting only once, with a cast time of 6.5 seconds.
Lets say we have a wa and a bl, with the exact same gear.
A WA attacks using it's comp skill. It takes 3 seconds to cast it, and it ends up doing 5k dmg when it crits. Blader comp takes 3 sec to cast as well, but deals 2k dmg, 6 times. That is more than twice the dmg.
Ofcourse, if you compare ONE hit only, warriors deal more dmg, but it just doesn't work that way