d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo > Diablo 3 > D3 Discussion > Jay Wilson Was Never Powerful Enough
1234Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 31,939
Joined: Sep 21 2007
Gold: 1,121.00
Nov 14 2018 08:03pm
to destroy the diablo franchise completely. It took a man of great power, and jay wilson was only the lesser evil. The man I speak of is no other than Bobby kotick. We were all blinded by jay wilson being used as a scape goat. The same thing that is happening with wyatt cheng as well.
Member
Posts: 15,939
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 102,354.50
Nov 14 2018 09:54pm
Wilson made it shit and doubled it, Kotick makes things shit and then quadruples it
Member
Posts: 19,181
Joined: Nov 12 2005
Gold: 30.70
Nov 15 2018 08:55am
:zzz:
Member
Posts: 3,626
Joined: Sep 12 2011
Gold: 679.00
Nov 15 2018 09:12am
i dident know this man Bobby Kotick... lol, his board member of The Coca-Cola Company so maybe kinda of a John Sculley^^

imo wilson was allright, i remember having run in patch 1.3 and 1.4.. but after he left RoS expan ruined the game

This post was edited by Haj on Nov 15 2018 09:13am
Member
Posts: 10,060
Joined: Mar 30 2010
Gold: 10,779.02
Nov 15 2018 10:54am
I can't wait until they release how they plan to Monitize for this shit phone game.

I'm sure they'll do it right before launch to try and hide it.

Micro transactions Incoming!!!!
Member
Posts: 92,940
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Nov 15 2018 03:27pm
Quote (djman72 @ Nov 15 2018 10:54am)
I can't wait until they release how they plan to Monitize for this shit phone game.

I'm sure they'll do it right before launch to try and hide it.

Micro transactions Incoming!!!!


they already kinda have. although not 100% specifics.

in the Q&A day 2 session a guy asked about trading, and cited how "bad" the D3 real money AH was, but then how much worse trading got when everything was soulbound gear. and then wrapped it up by comparing it to D2, where "the company struggled for years to shut down 3rd party sellers", his words not mine. i agree they struggled, i just disagree it's an issue.

well the answer basically wen't something like this, and im just parapgrasing:

"in diablo 2 trading lead to lots of 3rd party sales, and that was bad bad bad, so we want to avoid that. In d3 the rmah was bad bad bad, because it got abused and was hard to police plus a GM ticket nightmare. so bad bad bad. then in d3 we made a system where you could trade some items, like gems. so lets say you have 20 rubies and i have 20 emeralds. since the horidric cube has a recipe to convert gem types two players trading isn't problematic. because the gain is only negligible, only a small number of meanial crafting materials have been avoided. so that's an example of good trade, and we're going to try and emulate that model"

tl;dr / translation:

when two players trade, because there isn't a medium to use as an exchance like valuable gold or something, one player can take advantage of another player. i can trade you a soj for a pair of mages, because i really want a pair of mages, but you basically just took advantage of me. and by making items tradeable, blizzard stands to allow 3rd party sites to make money. so translation, there will be next to zero economy. blizzard thinks trading red gems for green gems in equal number is the height of good gameplay. its odd and i fucking hate them.
Member
Posts: 12,739
Joined: Aug 19 2008
Gold: 785.00
Nov 15 2018 04:12pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Nov 15 2018 09:27pm)
they already kinda have. although not 100% specifics.

in the Q&A day 2 session a guy asked about trading, and cited how "bad" the D3 real money AH was, but then how much worse trading got when everything was soulbound gear. and then wrapped it up by comparing it to D2, where "the company struggled for years to shut down 3rd party sellers", his words not mine. i agree they struggled, i just disagree it's an issue.

well the answer basically wen't something like this, and im just parapgrasing:

"in diablo 2 trading lead to lots of 3rd party sales, and that was bad bad bad, so we want to avoid that. In d3 the rmah was bad bad bad, because it got abused and was hard to police plus a GM ticket nightmare. so bad bad bad. then in d3 we made a system where you could trade some items, like gems. so lets say you have 20 rubies and i have 20 emeralds. since the horidric cube has a recipe to convert gem types two players trading isn't problematic. because the gain is only negligible, only a small number of meanial crafting materials have been avoided. so that's an example of good trade, and we're going to try and emulate that model"

tl;dr / translation:

when two players trade, because there isn't a medium to use as an exchance like valuable gold or something, one player can take advantage of another player. i can trade you a soj for a pair of mages, because i really want a pair of mages, but you basically just took advantage of me. and by making items tradeable, blizzard stands to allow 3rd party sites to make money. so translation, there will be next to zero economy. blizzard thinks trading red gems for green gems in equal number is the height of good gameplay. its odd and i fucking hate them.


no way i'll read this, even the tldr is too long

just gonna say games shit
Member
Posts: 13,724
Joined: Oct 18 2007
Gold: 0.00
Nov 15 2018 06:25pm
Diablo 3 is casual.
People pay Activision money to play a casual game.
People have phones.

Why wouldn’t they make d3 mobile?

The app will do great. Activision knows this. The diablo 3 fans for some reason are pretending they are hardcore gamers or something lmao. The whole situation is a joke to me.
Member
Posts: 12,739
Joined: Aug 19 2008
Gold: 785.00
Nov 15 2018 08:05pm
Quote (Numbers @ Nov 16 2018 12:25am)
Diablo 3 is casual.
People pay Activision money to play a casual game.
People have phones.

Why wouldn’t they make d3 mobile?

The app will do great. Activision knows this. The diablo 3 fans for some reason are pretending they are hardcore gamers or something lmao. The whole situation is a joke to me.


d3 players crying because blizzard is dumbing down the franchise with immortal = :rofl:
Member
Posts: 19,181
Joined: Nov 12 2005
Gold: 30.70
Nov 15 2018 08:15pm
Quote (Numbers @ Nov 15 2018 08:25pm)
Diablo 3 is casual.
People pay Activision money to play a casual game.
People have phones.

Why wouldn’t they make d3 mobile?

The app will do great. Activision knows this. The diablo 3 fans for some reason are pretending they are hardcore gamers or something lmao. The whole situation is a joke to me.


D3 gamers are hardcore gamers?

Lol.
Go Back To D3 Discussion Topic List
1234Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll