D3.

you cant judge a game thats not out yet

i got to go with d3 only because a root canal would be a better time then that boring so called WoW

d2>wow imo... You can not beat the classics...

Just because theres a lot to do in wow doesn't make it the better game, some times simpler is in fact better... Once the new patch comes through diablo will be way better imo, no iron maiden or ubers leveling...

Not quiet sure what people are talking about when they say diablo is full of hackers and the classes are un even... Guessing you havn't played .12patch at all? Next to no hackers now... Will be even less once 1.13 comes through. Also the classes are not un even... it all depends on how you play them.

d3 >>>>>>>>>>

You must be on crack. D2 has always had hackers in it. And having something to do in a game kind of makes it playable. What are your options in d2 once you've geared out your character? Go "grind" a boss to make some fg, go pvp with quite possibly one of the worst pvp systems?
D2 was good for it's time. Comparing it to modern games is fucking stupid.

Funny you mention the pvp style lol, thats one of the main reasons I like it... Far better then wow's imo, but that is my opinion and yours is yours. It's obviouse we disagree...

There are 7diffrent classes and over 4-5builds for each class each class and builld using diffrent gear, or you can make a simple build with mass used gear and just hang out with freinds... Diablo doesn't have to be a time consuming game like wow, if you want you can spend 10k fg and be a god or you can make one of the cookie cutter cheap builds and just hang out with freinds dueling or pvm...

Some people argue diablo expansion is boring because everyone has the same gear, not true... only noobs use the same gear, pro's use rares and crafted items.

As for comparing classic games to modern, I think you have it the wrong way.... You can't beat the classics man, I'm 17 and I still know mario>all games. Yes it may get boring and I may play other games but mario is still the best.

Edit: having hackers and being full of hackers is diffrent... Public duels are no where near as bad as they were in .11. All games have hackers. Yes you could argue that diablo is a bad game because some people hack, but you could also argue that wow is a bad game because the monthly cost... Each game has its own croud, thats why I said "imo";).


This post was edited by Kevorkian on Feb 16 2010 12:17pm

Diablo

























Or wow?

You assume wow has to be a time consuming game, it really doesn't. You can spend maybe 4hours a week and still high the best possible pvp gear in the game. I'm not even exaggerating either.

Problem with d2, there is absolutely no incentive to pvp. What do you gain from it? Nothing?
Ok, so you have boring pvp, very limited amount of players per game, terrible idea with running back to your corpse naked. Whoever thought up the absorb idea should be shot.
The charm idea is fucking stupid. At least make it a seperate inventory for charms rather than preventing you from looting anything.
It's also pretty boring to play the game all over again just to build a second spec of the SAME CLASS.

To top this all off, there's nothing to do in the game.

diablo is one of the best gaming series ever produced, and im sure d3 will live up to the hype