Quote (Psycho116 @ Dec 31 2010 11:35pm)

I'd rather it be free to play.

Quote (sb_0414 @ 30 Dec 2010 21:56)

their* fail correction is fail.

Quote (Boogersnot308 @ Jan 1 2011 05:38pm)

Like I said before, I just don't see it having enough content for P2P.
And also like I said before, SC II alone has enough content for me to skip playing D3 if it's P2P.

For the people that have enough money where it doesn't matter, good for them.
But not everyone wants to pay for a game each month, especially if they have limited time to play it, I'm sorry that's so hard for you to understand Josh.

Quote (josh2234 @ 2 Jan 2011 11:16)

Im thinking outside the box. Alot of people are using there own personal hardships as a "scapegoat" to counteract my side.

Oh, I cant play that much each month... or.... I cant afford another 10-15$ bill each month.

Look at the big picture.

Quote (josh2234 @ Sep 9 2010 05:01pm)

Ok guys let get this straight.

If you QQ about paying 10$-15$ a month to pay to play for a game, I think your living in like 1995 first of all.

The reason im saying this is, I dont want Diablo 3 to end up like Diablo 2. I.E, scammmers,bots,cheat,hacks,dupes,spam,non english speakin people who are geting paid 1$ a week in a sweatshop because we want that bad ass item.

Ill go into detail. When a company stops selling there game in mass amounts, they no longer are making decent $$ to support that game, whatever it may be. So charging a small amount every month gives them ability to support it, and solve the problems such as cheaters, viruses, hacks, gold farmers wtf ever...... AND ADD NEW CONTENT, AND FIX THE OLD OFC

I personally also wouldnt want the guild wars approach either,...... coming out with an expansion every time someone cries so they can support there non paying game.

If Diablo 3 is not pay to play, I give it a few months before it turns into the shit hole that d2 did.

Opinions? Flames? Donations ?

Quote (Composure @ Sep 9 2010 10:11pm)

I actually agree 100%. Any game that is pay to play is much more successful than a game that has a one time fee.

Quote (Pollepigen @ Jan 2 2011 05:38pm)

true. but think about this: A game like world of warcraft which have been out for 6 years. costs 12.95 euros a month with over 11mil subscribers.

that is 10.256.400.000 Euros since release (if all 11mil were playing since the beginning) isn't that way too much to earn on a game which there always are some sort of problem with?

i play wow my self. and i enjoy playing it, no doubt. but with all these money in mind that blizzard make on it? i feel kinda pity with people who want every game to cost money just to let it be a more successful game.

Take a look at diablo 2. how many played that stupid game? without no monthly fee, and still people are playing the day today? look at the graphics? it's horrible.

I vote no go to fee on diablo 3!