I voted no. I wouldn't pay for it.

I wanted to play WoW because I loved Warcraft 3. But when it turned out to be Pay-to-Play I went with guild wars (for a bit, then I quit guild wars). Anyways, I have never touched WoW and never will.

If Diablo 3 were pay to play, I'd probably stop playing Blizzard games all together. I'm not impressed with Starcraft 2 so yeah.

do you have a job?

I work inbetween semesters in college. Summer, sometimes winter, and during weekends if my semester isn't too harsh.

I don't like wasting money on pay-per-month. It's not worth it to me. Part of it is the different crowds it attracts and detracts.

i feel you on that... if d3 is anything like wow i would say fuck that game

well if you had a steady job, even just making minimum wage for 20 hours a week, $15 a month isnt shit. if anything, f2p games attract a worse crowd cuz its just a bunch of kids who cant afford anything



it could also be really good in its own way and be hardly anything like wow other than the common characteristics that all rpgs share. so if its pay to play, you still wouldnt play?

why ask stupid questions

70% of jsp is 14 year olds who dont have income

Whats a measly 15-20 a month for a nice updated game.

no! i will never pay again monthly for any game.. played wow for about ~3 years.. thats nearly ~450 euro enough for 1 life



and no im not under 20.. yes i got income..

This post was edited by MeSmiter on Nov 25 2010 03:57pm

this

I'd rather play a broken game with infrequent updates than paying $240 a year to play a game. Not to mention SC2 isn't pay to play and Blizzard updates that weekly. The only reason D2 gets no support is because it's old and outdated. You're retarded if you think modern day Blizzard is going to abandon a game a year after release because they did it a decade ago.

True Dat